From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:02:01 -0700 Message-ID: <87y2g33e5i.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6sjpyqs.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11433"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 04 19:53:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7jkn-0002sD-Qq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 19:53:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59686 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7jkm-0006sI-ON for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:53:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7iwT-00020p-26 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:40087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7iwL-0006ot-E1; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:01:20 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5795C006E; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:01:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:01:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=v+Ezd88jV4Co4HfLMTf+8r4e4G zwD6btl5vTvm7Yt8c=; b=HyWiWIVeUk4DhUsbHtu7aoE0T9b3LI8IDD3f+ECmnu wYrM5q1kXT0e3ip7ng0g9pl9CgA807w8LGfDZ9x30MLaCaczaPxrC9mlKC8LtFg2 XJEkUDozPn8YMYgBo58UnRSQ/Fkx76Vt5cBcQMjI/oz2oZtb3EHS2/3vQD65mx+g +aQTsKF1mWIBfAuZJnOaYiRpBDc4yJI/fyeO+udiu4QRy/Ed37Co2II6H/TyFb8S HKR8jbWYvCq0b8gC5H04RP00nm1XNFiyiKWH7xEgsvUZifokqdV61nyENwFlzx+5 292CLNV5UUqK9OO2GLjptBfhnlQhEF02BD9luTzw1Rxg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=v+Ezd8 8jV4Co4HfLMTf+8r4e4GzwD6btl5vTvm7Yt8c=; b=rUu0LwoATy73+E4TgIuXvk 6zdH5VyA8xBL0e0o6KcvBaJECCDkkw//MyreY3jEiu7k450A7uCNqyRHG81tUZGU GJ+ifNLeVRUeWKg3n2Leytm9xKIzzjXmiG4S1Njr90Qj3I/qCJ4F8Fg4oQFDv77q T7C7YHZblyMqsllqpHEI3T1P4APK6N36S94gQbfqIL2SICKYFFRVfqBrPOmH7/M0 ph131eeljL9n2qUKwaXj5J8ZxT82SSd0rOM/sRQL0FYAi2btrRUKKgH5Y26i3ztF VxKmKQ69Sx+Fz+Iar2D0KacoYXMAFh39Z8i0kmlYTUGaHZHkvGNSa7IGs1bW+cvQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgeeggdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffujghffffkgggtsehttdertddttddtnecuhfhrohhmpefuvggrnhcuhghh ihhtthhonhcuoehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgeqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgedtvdehgeffhfffvdeffefhgfejffelhfetveffffektefgtdej tdeivddtveehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: In-Reply-To: <87a6sjpyqs.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.29; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=out5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263895 Archived-At: Hello, On Thu 04 Feb 2021 at 05:46PM +01, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Gregory Heytings writes: > >> You forgot the proposal to which the mail you are replying to >> explicitly refers. So I'll copy it here again: it is to make "C-x g" >> a keymap for buffer-related operations, with in particular "C-x g r" >> bound to revert-buffer: >> >> C-x g c = clone-buffer >> C-x g d = diff-buffers >> C-x g f = fit-frame-to-buffer >> C-x g h = hexl-mode >> C-x g i = insert-buffer >> C-x g l = font-lock-mode >> C-x g n = rename-buffer >> C-x g r = revert-buffer >> C-x g R = revert-buffer-with-fine-grain >> C-x g t = toggle-truncate-lines > > Of the alternative key bindings proposed, I like this the best. I'd > prefer `C-x g g' for revert-buffer, though -- it's more in like with the > `g' binding in `special-mode-map', and `revert-buffer' is a command > you're likely to want to execute a number of times (in some cases), > while the rest of these are less keyboard-mashey. I had this thought too, C-x g g is preferable to C-x g r. -- Sean Whitton