From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f8fed41 2/3: image-dired: Improve XDG compliance Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:14:33 +0000 Message-ID: <87y26hqdxy.fsf@posteo.net> References: <83sfwp1c27.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31569"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 18:17:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mf2eo-0007zB-08 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:17:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53020 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf2em-0006Ud-VI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf2cT-0004mT-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:14:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:36913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf2cP-00035O-GC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:14:41 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5F34240105 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:14:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1635178475; bh=H4LF28mZnnXETD6XuPwuUMM5k7mqPXTlXeIp+RZf3BA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=lod+JOvyzesSWv06D2rd3Om5lxqAqNgjH/Y0Ka9YRvg0ae5PmPvBxr5TuiXgVMKNb +UeBWnEsYtgeQPGhwGnF5rPRn8sGna7zdn/6fLXHeYKN+cAL+/jVml1RlqoPZE99GK bDD+QKaVYeV89FZSMtSrWGtIyJ9QEHgGsVjvl2hCuw4UlcvsPNqbmN1FRSO+85f9yk CPpE0BJTLGs9hv7w8jd+11VT3cz8+FJNAzOZPZ1rknD9JyoCFe7HAe1ILkYz0NZmP0 UHU5esI//8Ze5mRJptesgV3+m4yTwqBJqEPwy5/+CZ/yc2flDLd7Pg9BbNzy9n03Mj aXuyRDwGaCiuA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4HdKlv26fqz6tmS; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:14:35 +0200 (CEST) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: <83sfwp1c27.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:14:24 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277761 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > XDG is also prone to fashion changes. What will we do when it goes > out of fashion, and we have dozens of xdg-user-dir calls in our > application code? change all of them to some latest desktop fashion? What do you mean by this? Shouldn't XDG as a specification prevent this from being an issue? -- Philip Kaludercic