From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: File names in ChangeLog entries Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 11:28:46 -0600 Message-ID: <87y254z12p.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <831r2xt32t.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilw8sa9j.fsf@gnu.org> <835ys8s1gg.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Karl Fogel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20809"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: stefan@marxist.se, Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 01 18:34:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msTUq-0005AV-Py for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:34:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36148 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTUp-0003tN-Ti for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:34:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTPq-0006ki-1C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:29:10 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([45.79.25.59]:48980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTPm-0007ti-9F; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:29:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=red-bean.com; s=202005newsp; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=0Iqv8kPz2V979DvXErDTFQkZK5gxffAVpe9YoWhbqXE=; t=1638379744; x=1639589344; b=ijs3Z3QJRlDMkLrAVwtcvjzvvvpRJiPs2kl3xLpoMaeDRSnnSCH6efNiBUC5zAivGc2WgdwMOBT giqBFN273pYetJCNrNLgkjQMj9eAcYmldkezTjrslesu6AJmAF3lApYtDTiip4i+8V9rik8WOcCG/ CAXiV/xOYTDGC5BtfWm8SVh/uYTPQURDmL18djUNxerCIVOVfTU3FQn15sLaH3HVvabsWOBoSbViJ H8uOj2Qu0OL97RzvMdz6gPYvXczBRtNcVgMtg1mTsqrumwCvBXQQzABTeoSppNFh2EiR5OzPo6QRf jvNwmmWDFdnLY2BEJcW66m9ID11hq5BYMeGw==; Original-Received: from 99-112-125-163.lightspeed.cicril.sbcglobal.net ([99.112.125.163]:60080 helo=floss) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1msTPV-006Yz3-BE; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 17:28:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <835ys8s1gg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 01 Dec 2021 19:02:23 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.79.25.59; envelope-from=kfogel@red-bean.com; helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280658 Archived-At: >No. I don't understand why you insist on putting the >file/function >part on the first (a.k.a. "header") line. The header line is >supposed >to be a summary, so that the likes of > > git log --pretty='format:%h %cd %an %s' > >work as expected. This is all documented in CONTRIBUTE, by the way. If someone wants to argue that we should change the standard, that's a different conversation. I'm just saying (and I think this might be partly what Eli is saying too) that there *is* currently a standard and there's no ambiguity about what that standard is. Best regards, -Karl