From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tim Cross Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: with-pgtk: C-; turns into plain ';' Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:19:06 +1100 Message-ID: <87y22bmihf.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871r04zqbv.fsf@yahoo.com> <838ruc458z.fsf@gnu.org> <874k50xmye.fsf@yahoo.com> <835ypg449d.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfsj7k7x.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5239"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.7.7; emacs 28.0.91 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 16 08:21:49 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nKEdJ-00017C-0M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:21:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56324 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nKEdH-0001Ej-3N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 02:21:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nKDpP-0005hR-G6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 01:30:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::534] (port=41509 helo=mail-pg1-x534.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nKDpN-0006ZM-Tx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 01:30:15 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id f8so1285131pgc.8 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:30:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=Q81Ukf2WyJyhji85+6AzZsjdah9OEKfpMZyE80i6e4k=; b=TGduLj6b2vyRreZbVEKnHONFEsWycqSJJNxjJ0Po5Lr20nmiov9rNrdqOgseb7Ai0d oTGMtWPslX3AGA4aEKYvolQi+qEacjtKoNQzW8pwYHXpnZXR80AvqRq5pPKZlCany21w rxtWijt5Kl9fNygsRhsREs+Rni0E05JbfeM5neKdJRQpXKOZtYnPV+PAbVxm4j0QIeBD udkstUuB0JhugJIcY09rmZaywiZvCEN+cjd4qweEqZcQ/KzbR0dKryuhbyVDAjwvjpfa 12w1on/nsQBPzMVVlLuUD8qRmITL68BshErD6wsbh9ckW8M+eXFFZDSYHDoRGTZ1/Mx8 5IeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=Q81Ukf2WyJyhji85+6AzZsjdah9OEKfpMZyE80i6e4k=; b=U/QCDfhpMDLrncUHLXh9set1dRmzBg39gD+B7z+h5Y9nUbEoHn3YLmIU/bKV55HQpO RpjzgnlDoGlOxrt4C5L1oeKGimqE7+cWs6ztn4UsyT+fk0VLsRGwZoo3j14rX2HY/oNM GQVQUcmFE253+G++Go+MgNLunZs0K2m20dZkMQd9Z49bKZUyBJDOsCx0KmWScelv8Khw mlkRXGV02dWLSZ/cs2Nw20fGEedIARlYIpFO/GVG1BEehZ0bIizRaT1GcrhzmJkq4837 /5Gl6g3rPMBsl7Z1mjzk6TijXQCozChxMtl+JQvd/FL9C14Kzyxpq8IPW+/6T1yDDs1n LpEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rUh68cLK6xZShRZB4pce1nK0H14B/QvmhsLOLQ70+nRO4FF/o tAip8VMZ1SGM3zeeWKO8U3DQBVI/aJ8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYnuj01nOOJc/3OvCKjgxJUmoqkLoAxPHuMGg1W3LHrPrgRJv9ycXGnPhgt0dpoyLax5qTgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:d44:0:b0:36c:644e:791c with SMTP id 4-20020a630d44000000b0036c644e791cmr1058408pgn.417.1644993012332; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:30:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from dingbat (2001-44b8-31f2-bb00-04d8-83c6-7ba7-6a67.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31f2:bb00:4d8:83c6:7ba7:6a67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d22sm41530636pfl.71.2022.02.15.22.30.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:30:12 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::534 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::534; envelope-from=theophilusx@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x534.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -3 X-Spam_score: -0.4 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.904, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286368 Archived-At: "T.V Raman" writes: > Tim Cross writes: > > More importantly, that this difference only showed up recently makes me > still want to call it a bug --- not a "Xis old and broken go away if it > doesn't work" view-point. > This is a very important point! If you were running the pgtk build and all the key bindings were working fine and then suddenly they stopped working, I would agree it it likely there is something more going on than simply "a known problem with gtk and input methods".Especially as it is unlikely you changed input methods settings. It may be a mistake to just write this off as a "known issue". Will be interesting if others running pgtk under X also start noticing issues. While I'm not running the pgtk build at present, have to admit that when I did a few months back, I did not encounter any key binding issues under X. Have to admit, I didn't do anthing 'special' with input methods. Just ran it under various X envrionments (Stumpwm, Ubuntu Matge and a brief experiment with Exwm).