From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Visuwesh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55039: [PATCH] Use VC-relative file names in ChangeLog entries Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 18:43:22 +0530 Message-ID: <87y1uuvwjx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8735i7zvk4.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8v3sq0n.fsf@gnu.org> <87czc8u56q.fsf@gnus.org> <871qsooenn.fsf@posteo.net> <87o7vsfu5p.fsf@posteo.net> <83y1uwijzt.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkrsdzzm.fsf@posteo.net> <83mtbafip7.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfl26ypw.fsf@posteo.net> <87lequ3w20.fsf@gnus.org> <878rmuxdmg.fsf@gmail.com> <87bkrq3v13.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17259"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , Eli Zaretskii , 55039@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 08 15:16:27 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWHON-0004Ez-Hw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:16:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37040 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWHOM-0007dA-GX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:16:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWHM2-0004sQ-Qa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40734) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWHM2-0008MA-H4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWHM2-0003lx-Am for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Visuwesh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55039 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo patch Original-Received: via spool by 55039-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55039.166264281514427 (code B ref 55039); Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2022 13:13:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57660 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWHLb-0003kd-5J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:13:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:42709) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWHLZ-0003kP-6B for 55039@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:13:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id b23so1309974pfp.9 for <55039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 06:13:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=2iDEAjoCWEWTMYXlacqFdcBefZePqzN7oac0Mu2As64=; b=Y9UgO17b5bGuWkwQ4w0FTiQgjCFfLqpNGvfpPZqrb29Jc8xfdq7mhIbMzGmbQzP/di zb98oSgaIdPwCy8AdOKUD7nGzrp2oZiMkjSHjuU38rH+m5GvyNTOA7QJWvEwQGHb5buk suDsegM0HbKmnWxfplb3E9uAj4nUpb+pyVXLTMLllVHQueXJHjDBDcYQ/yALLEjHLU2R pgoypbfzFecx4XgRA8fasKpNqRSMps8f4K4vDtgYAwYquvUCRdC24NlMOLx7oMQ0S3rl dAL+9mgHi48I9sOpiuSzv/riDbVjIfKsI23q5wnc0maQmCUttWo+i9sJmMkVtnSp9PTk 8a6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date; bh=2iDEAjoCWEWTMYXlacqFdcBefZePqzN7oac0Mu2As64=; b=JJQkYeWJ8uYvIYSJobuIzY9OszyEJJxkfXkYSYx1gkRsVrFRepT9d3+9vHhfKaLb9F o7ZmsL+TuadfXFbyCnLcKdch5RSgQEpUpmfh87EkGuxvqkXCwNrkvFpLSQubia39YOdU L9e7DaBrHXSI+WJVqgsN4Tg4t5pnJXvZTsE90U0ITdMxCZkgTKioqewT9GfnWORJkJMA oCPdNzWuxVXzp9LctBz/weCuGlSoP/E5NF2/pHnJGvdjbAIko6ayAbk8LqXPzpxggDFn skjEPa9/aeD3nhgqPcO/ZeI+WtEapu5BJAyFhcJXT57r9KXiihdA8CXVQQXk4qIeXm30 AVZw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1sYKSalSecae9PM6Q5sUr7sS0RI/Be7IoHIQgIRFta7Xatx7Kk ruagxOUsVldeLZqpAW8V6Hw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5oDtV6gh3iDgoaLvEwjxniNICJKhVtUItlj4UfqIGh6fuoB/Sotfx7A64w2bykQF8iKc70ZA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e513:0:b0:42b:d733:602d with SMTP id r19-20020a63e513000000b0042bd733602dmr7499408pgh.549.1662642807041; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 06:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([115.240.90.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y14-20020aa79e0e000000b0053f2505318asm2110241pfq.142.2022.09.08.06.13.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Sep 2022 06:13:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bkrq3v13.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:33:44 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241880 Archived-At: [=E0=AE=B5=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=AF=E0=AE=BE=E0=AE=B4=E0=AE=A9=E0=AF=8D =E0=AE=9A= =E0=AF=86=E0=AE=AA=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=9F=E0=AE=AE=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=AA=E0=AE=B0=E0= =AF=8D 08, 2022] Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Visuwesh writes: > >> Can we not change where boundp is located? I.e., >> >> ;; boundp foo-bar: t >> >> ? IMO, this also reads nicely. > > But is that backwards-compatible? Doesn't seem to be the case unfortunately. No idea what I was thinking about when I wrote that.