From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dick Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57804: An infinite loop in a `fontify-region' function causes Emacs to hang indefinitely Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 18:20:49 -0400 Message-ID: <87y1uki8ji.fsf@dick> References: <87pmfx6h7y.fsf@gnus.org> <2b58b8f5429a6e3aecda@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34246"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.14 (Gnus v5.14) Commercial/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 57804@debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Pogonyshev To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 16 06:28:12 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oZ2xW-0008iu-TB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 06:28:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44636 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZ2xV-0003dD-SR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:28:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZ2xP-0003bH-1W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZ2xO-0005GU-Ph for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZ2xN-0006sr-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: dick Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 04:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57804 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 57804-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57804.166330248126458 (code B ref 57804); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 04:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57804) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2022 04:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41126 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZ2xK-0006sV-8C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qv1-f48.google.com ([209.85.219.48]:41570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYxE9-00018a-9P for 57804@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 18:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qv1-f48.google.com with SMTP id l14so6880669qvq.8 for <57804@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:20:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=9SvL0s3G3DZQ6jIQxv8Kquie4XhzyN1c/E51Xtm2c5o=; b=MqXkUMhdwMaFegvBWcw7sI29wF8voykln0eMaWZzZHG+D0CU+uejrVW3MbdvPyYxxQ ANpkEEJmVxq3UWcNPizEzkm7H3HadONiJDAUOrpPi3qMc7zUR8llOu+R7QwaoRCqrn5I oI1QVgEKxe0rXSl3FpsT6wM9o9EA95nn9c4l8TsDs37EHjvdZcDOrSYMnaepKVckDMNn FgAQpdELT0YKxsnODdgWYThYvcjILb+wuQsh+ibknMl5yMs6X7MogSCrjlJIQL3FZiev 99zmzfk5szYQiqZPaM3+i33SmVUXLKU62iL7iIAzBPvpx3KXyu15qjattzSc0FZMkOTq aD3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=9SvL0s3G3DZQ6jIQxv8Kquie4XhzyN1c/E51Xtm2c5o=; b=FuLnjrFm/pJWfHg+hOlUjM/CV2BTSCl793Wl7eq1qtr08YWPelvNJP1OWzQdoXR8Sp 25OzZRiQ8b2WCF35SRtICP9Sl47V6RSuoasWMwWN7cV4IoLM93w5EUnBOAtiP+/7k6pK VK5q/MvHbbpquY7xtCHoBH0Btg5Ju1TY/NNH1826yebZlcyW164GrEbCg1cyTUqfzZ4S /zaNFbgwQ/xN0QmKylUKgDrwxc6vrwXWke34jsn6oz+aDTeTHQezlfCYkzPaTYn9QJGB zJ3z4VSfYQZhbMlzDB3gYfS5Y9cYfKgVQQy7oo5tPpLNs+5DIRTN7z1w2Ob9b/FY5Bw4 g6nw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1e/fK5EgZAOr4CyqbgHoIN8/MJv1i7dXn8mcCPxgxyQl0hUHle m9rJdZBTQldumkfbYjLWQv0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM44AImv6pRJUlSdCbi4t57I6RPNCI0DOuM17j/XJC1PF1IdZLgifIPAYVZNCH7HJhQ+/pyhIA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1c07:b0:4a4:bf44:df79 with SMTP id u7-20020a0562141c0700b004a4bf44df79mr1629823qvc.1.1663280450582; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (pool-173-56-234-28.nycmny.fios.verizon.net. [173.56.234.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bp12-20020a05620a458c00b006bb619a6a85sm4778182qkb.48.2022.09.15.15.20.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:20:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Gregory Heytings's message of "Thu, 15 Sep 2022 19:44:30 +0000") X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:27:55 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242680 Archived-At: GH> the general fix will be to adapt Logview to handle locked narrowing I wonder what kind of person is so idle, recalcitrant, and obnoxious that he has all day to work on a private fork of emacs, refuses to upstream his changes, all the while insulting the community. Ah, that would be I. I also wonder however, what kind of person becomes so triggered by a YouTube video about long lines, dedicates innumerable hours to implementing and shepherding a fix, amplifies the exceptions to a competing heuristic, but blithely dismisses exceptions to his own heuristic ("I bet we'll never get a bug report about that," "Don't worry, that won't happen"), who also dismisses hard performance metrics by claiming unrealistic usage patterns, who then when presented with a real-world failure suggests the aggrieved module ought to accommodate his long lines fix, and goes so far as to characterize that accommodation as "a general fix." Generally, I wonder what it is about emacs that brings out not just the worst developers, but also the worst people.