From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Augusto Stoffel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: jinx Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 10:35:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87y1ncf19a.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87sfdnyuxc.fsf@posteo.de> <83sfdl2z26.fsf@gnu.org> <835yag16yt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39735"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: rms@gnu.org, m.eliachevitch@posteo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 01 10:36:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1piWie-000A7m-J3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 10:36:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piWiK-0000Lh-Ap; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 04:35:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piWiF-0000LT-Ny for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 04:35:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piWiE-0007oJ-6O; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 04:35:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id y4so98839078edo.2; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 01:35:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680338147; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4Wb5TULE021+X3bgulDr1Ns0kgiUfNwpmZShv52YdRw=; b=cY43WQ0+UtaZvM9Ecj3oCbizjYysdgzubDlDaJ7yAFd02GL4WxOonosKHwyPzdC+g4 8oJ5YhWa5z8gw0xQcfBMsvNM7qTdedFFm69Na90OGZxYYV0TitRQtr/nb0iwNPw9jY9N Op/p46TsqC2OUV0JpO6mE7/coeUxOtvmpDJA+utNWrw4PlSUGAWSoobw/31qE2vrKS8N +BXfn+gqS6sRdtwXO7r4LyVwczMfDp3A2pXcXCP93zHRQTEiciYOu0d6RfBNN/9L4vPz fvtqv3jdEKcTd4EjDPTqs1jJlAVslc+RL3EMwHjLYBVIdpHIxK5j/63Z9qRDEdxdJMZ0 Uv2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680338147; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=4Wb5TULE021+X3bgulDr1Ns0kgiUfNwpmZShv52YdRw=; b=6PTS43+gaaAio7lR5BY09rSKX1DkTZatTEGe/HrrCoJaNWeY/QK47bmg1FIkI7ZDhl FNBwqgZr21WA6JLexnE791wbxs9wfnop5dSI3LWez2Pm0OmbacmSsoyIJQi2V0Zdxp7f 6xfdypm46k3gGQ+Q3Ooaub08nBGzHcUQ0bDbuHvNJRMkbbQBPCbsjqmLw5kBhDcJGGny oq32mMQuXtA7oVY+EteL5ndLUAIz26pu3bZeR+FJAlilCDMtCB1cCXOjdGJAntJLqZ4g eDwzvQ+MwwWL/0+/V1N/yGe2Tl03Xe2gVbFjHRnn918WAz+FbWI9DeSvUv2cGjoXNKVi 1/iQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eNZT2uXpC4dhjbJtr8ZcuttJdL36g8IGeXAiFCe5Mwv/gl336R +e0ULnytrsDORgQ6OHV+W1msJ29Nfvzuag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZPHSmjfZnxlBiOaxpch7Jj9B8PPXfpGK1tcVEe7mVLo6zXEg6O97FkdMeandFWWuSvGxHdAw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e0c5:b0:931:4f2c:4e83 with SMTP id gl5-20020a170906e0c500b009314f2c4e83mr29287058ejb.63.1680338147475; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 01:35:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ars3 ([2a02:8109:8ac0:56d0::f39f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n7-20020a170906700700b009324717b9f3sm1857631ejj.71.2023.04.01.01.35.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 01 Apr 2023 01:35:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <835yag16yt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 01 Apr 2023 08:56:10 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::530; envelope-from=arstoffel@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x530.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304982 Archived-At: On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 08:56, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Richard Stallman >> Cc: m.eliachevitch@posteo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:11:55 -0400 >> >> > jinx spell-checks the visible portion of the window. I don't see why >> > we would need that. Suppose I scroll the window by 2 lines: why would >> > I want the new visible portion to be spell-checked again, when the >> > overlap with the last check is so large? >> >> You mean, it doesn't remember which part has already been checked? > > It seems to rely on JIT font-lock mechanism to keep track of what was > already spell-checked. > > But my point was not about efficiency, it was about the user > experience: why would I want to have the visible portion marked with > mis-spelling indications at all times? This is not a natural way of > dealing with spelling mistakes. FWIW, this is what any word processor out there does. Personally I find it much more natural.