From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade' Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:44:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87y1mxrz90.fsf@posteo.net> References: <2726a957-a2a8-3b89-8930-2d620d83491e@alphapapa.net> <83sfd7c1v1.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya3euof.fsf@posteo.net> <87fs95a6y3.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31781"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Adam Porter , Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen , 62750@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 15:45:26 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmams-00082G-Ay for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:45:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaml-0006i7-TV; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:45:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmami-0006hV-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmamU-00064Q-5M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:45:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmamT-000175-Qd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:45:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62750 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62750-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62750.16813070624212 (code B ref 62750); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62750) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2023 13:44:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmalq-00015s-5h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:50995) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmalo-00015e-Sr for 62750@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:44:21 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 596C52403FD for <62750@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:44:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1681307055; bh=c/P6nF4lyjz3yC0qSDfYUtpK+dwB++3PBFk8c7h9SBM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=koGVL15ErZ+1go8MIbUM9A0OF+vGX9FlEW+oYLvjGwomD7CRPwEXKgYS76IZZHC4P Qs0BxgE0jOKeHUNHz6tuNrJqYDd+hu/nfdkgEGkjVLSEbJQjmycGe+ud0Prq3W9K/L 3ody4TDSOKQX/NimtxZ8yTwfdMnQQ+g+SkxdPUesfS7B74by0pmSzHXF6OVHUwGII+ KLfGGEflxKFaOxq4CsfzLKxE9UGE2FrSJu1I9NmP9d6Y+sctj4iC6Kow112nZoBrVs DTI3snMMxVBu6B6gQVmR4q0mjGySuogDeRfJ4G1NgjXLEYX4xHfrcRd/pb6ZJWdSdp M4ZwD92YlcOuA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PxP7y21zzz6twj; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:44:14 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:22:03 -0400") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259742 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>> It's annoyingly late to rename, but if we rename without compatibility >>> aliases (which seems to be an option since these are new in Emacs-29), >>> then I'd be in favor. >> >> What are compatibility aliases? I must have missed something? > > I thought we'd rename `package-update` to `package-upgrade` by adding > the new name and marking the old name as an obsolete alias (a > "compatibility alias"). > > I hadn't realized that `package-update` hasn't been in a release yet, so > we don't need such a compatibility alias. If this were to happen, I'd like to also be able to rename the analogous package-vc commands to upgrade as well. (On a related topic I have been wondering if package-update should handle package-vc packages at all, or if that was a mistake?)