From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Type declarations in Elisp Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 06:16:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87y1i3eh4k.fsf@localhost> References: <87il984vxv.fsf@localhost> <03fc79f4-a532-71b1-0de9-8e52bdf3f138@gmail.com> <87msykfwym.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37674"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, incal@dataswamp.org To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 22 08:17:09 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qYKhQ-0009XQ-Ti for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 08:17:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYKgg-0005ZQ-Bu; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 02:16:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYKge-0005Yg-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 02:16:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYKgb-0006gT-Vz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 02:16:20 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D82D0240103 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 08:16:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1692684975; bh=qbrQuOAkgBrYU3XAeUhhaKXI1irZVZAN6gS/4TSZndA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=du4V8jYVBE/6ilNBSXDYshygb87n224b7SyKxibSrztRxgpJ2VqdVQ80PZ272p8xK QdqlGNJbh95UziMzxKY1PsQt2WLmmJOk8jwdGlYHYSHkmwWjTx0r1D+9mbJStNHKot zGmUaH1Ilp03NG+26yJxVubn7UgZY3TLF7D7wTlB70pgb4CBhyhtiO14r7rPmFa/AY zzJ5tq0QcUIiVW75zUtyt3O3k7ddNYHKBs4lQrczKgbiCmFu/rnMKYmKtQ9SGK+Ri2 9NXo6GwE1k2B0skPNbC2e5U/JC5oz/yDQ9j3vG3Vfa/l6HHqi5EWncq3catqCyhUQ/ 9yzPmPe9KjHjg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RVJy46JgHz9rxL; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 08:16:12 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309103 Archived-At: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann writes: > I'm afraid I don't see much worth expanding on in the report. And the > question is, of course, how typical (tm) a result from make check is. I suspect that we cannot agree about this ever. It's like the best defaults - different for each individual user. What might be more practical is measuring performance of popular libraries/packages. --=20 Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at