From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:37:38 +0000 Message-ID: <87y1hqs07x.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <87il90znco.fsf@yahoo.com> <1977fbef-307b-bcf4-9448-64f26916dd65@gutov.dev> <87edjozlqq.fsf@yahoo.com> <43ddad10-49dd-1c49-ebfe-51689780b315@gutov.dev> <83jztgk410.fsf@gnu.org> <83edjojx8c.fsf@gnu.org> <8734zzv7vk.fsf@localhost> <83edjjecmx.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmxbtsd4.fsf@localhost> <83bkeneb8j.fsf@gnu.org> <87ledrtqzx.fsf@localhost> <837cpbe5vx.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttsfs6yo.fsf@localhost> <83v8cvcpqx.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5u7s5ii.fsf@localhost> <83r0njclsa.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32426"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, dmitry@gutov.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 11:38:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qc0bd-0008FF-HP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 11:38:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc0aj-0003mh-0G; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 05:37:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc0ac-0003gO-1n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 05:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc0aY-0001aw-5e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 05:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20CE0240103 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:37:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693561032; bh=2OSqCbEW4aJL2TX2sdzh6jH8H5pr6Lncxm6B1jdbaAI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=fEYok1OFpoH24dXYqDmco1C5vm9Y1yYLyEQUrNXmPyqFJ8DXpiM5/8Y2EFpI0uVPp vAXXqxkGbWOrfQ4smmZsuYfaf5cXd8P+Yelt0CwbWzvOlDuNWMmee3SUhZ2iIYAO8Y zn6EWuzpVL5eFfNHdz7ZdRP/yQjWBu53I69K0OhryzjtQzLCSQqQUJ9K3F9Bm9nTcR U/BXDFAzye2y7MiWAMGGUUZ5XrCIIrMjof92EMSJRpkVh2Fb3IjpDFhJXLF2CwSIeA 4PkbwmvrRjGCFuF9ZLPIXn+xVrwAc64l2aLJU/g37+Ss791+o7uqXT+S4PRUeseKTS +iv6A6AnBsHIA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RcXxM1Zpbz9rxG; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:37:10 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83r0njclsa.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309738 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > What I think we need is some kind of analysis or insights into the way > we receive feedback about releases and decide when we have "enough" to > make another release. For example, it would be useful, I think, to > know how the rate of reports about bugs and regressions depends on > time since the release. This could also benefit from tracking > specific categories of bugs (e.g., regressions) separately. If > someone could run such analyses on our bug DB, it might be useful for > setting or changing our criteria for a release, which currently are > based on gut feelings, more or less. AFAIK, Lars (in CC) did a similar kind of analysis in https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2021/08/14/10x10/ Maybe he can share the code he used to built those graphs. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at