From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Candidate packages for ELPA bundling [Was: Re: Why not include all ELPA packages in an Emacs release?] Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 16:24:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87y17f8ks4.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87bk4ql3u5.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <864jagu9ji.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmn076zr.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <87frtofbsg.fsf@yahoo.com> <95f1e7d8-193a-4ecd-94b8-cc7186dad0f9@gutov.dev> <87bk4cf8xr.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ikyk9bsx.fsf@posteo.net> <87v82jexgx.fsf@yahoo.com> <875xujanbe.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1609"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Po Lu , Dmitry Gutov , Jeremy Bryant , Stefan Kangas , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 08 18:25:29 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sFysj-0000EO-1m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 18:25:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFys9-0001JQ-Kh; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:24:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFys6-0001J0-Lw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:24:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFys4-0001Ln-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:24:50 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3000B24002B for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:24:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1717863886; bh=Pbbw2XX1RzpNrPSv866m8sFGluXMc/2lkm2q8JXHnfI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=ZbgOG+shPwt4JFS1Zjs9D+NevV/cw1hGJfrLNtlPzGuSFixFKS1FOgw5KNpFeStG8 f43WztznKJbQh6s9D4Fx1fdtKsifcKUyEkSB7sQYDIzbAqPSQe2ztTmcFNLRhCnu5R VG45uoAnzXjQt+9qXKRgekJGpH/D84qjJbMCWEeryPGQpnhX3x9uJAf4+bYR4omdag cX3BtP98/EUbiiM8zSjkE2+pIVo9y7hLOLIVhwlmeg0nCwdHZZ6Z/M8+aAp2CE7l/6 wGgtDGkPoPJDgNf63DbHUiIbmxolPB6QOpsxv0GOIJiBPzWXr9W38o6NPIicBdyp8F ZUVQe22Tqmb/Q== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VxNgw3xbCz6trs; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:24:44 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 08 Jun 2024 11:06:15 -0400") OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319907 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> No, I am talking about moving packages from ELPA into the core, not >> the other way around. > > As a general rule I'm opposed to *moving* packages from ELPA to > the core. IIUC we're discussing *bundling* ELPA package with Emacs (or > you can think of it as *adding* ELPA packages to Emacs). Right, my bad I didn't phrase that correctly. I agree totally. > > Stefan > -- Philip Kaludercic on peregrine