From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question. Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:13:48 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87wut79cb7.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87u1oo6xhm.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <8962-Fri31May2002214124+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <87elfs6spr.fsf@wesley.springies.com> <7999-Sat01Jun2002102420+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <878z5zvtlf.fsf@wesley.springies.com> <7680-Sat01Jun2002195058+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023736547 28452 127.0.0.1 (10 Jun 2002 19:15:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 19:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ats@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17HUdn-0007Od-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 21:15:47 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17HV0l-0008OU-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 21:39:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HUdH-0004sL-00; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:15:15 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HUc0-0004kO-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:13:56 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850C0647F; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:13:51 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D557D504; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:13:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <7680-Sat01Jun2002195058+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> ("Eli Zaretskii"'s message of "Sat, 01 Jun 2002 19:50:59 +0300") Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4716 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4716 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > That's a clear sign of a bug, IMHO. src/Makefile.in is supposed to > be set up so that all versions of Emacs get the same functions > documented. That's why ${docdir} is not architecture dependent. OK, so from what everyone says, it sounds like only the binary is supposed to differ, and so I should be able to just package that separately. What about the above comment, though? If the DOC issue is a bug, I'd be happy to see if I can fix it. I'd rather spend the time on that than on some less appropriate hack. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD