From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexander Pohoyda Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use Date: 19 Oct 2004 19:17:03 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87wtxmzkz4.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> References: <87pt3m5vqk.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <87zn2mh5jk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87is99nznd.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200410172053.i9HKrdL01136@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200410190158.i9J1wrH25523@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098206276 18600 80.91.229.6 (19 Oct 2004 17:17:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 19 19:17:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CJxcL-00011L-00 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:17:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJxjg-0000Wp-CU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:25:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CJxjI-0000TH-Go for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:25:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CJxjH-0000S6-MF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:24:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJxjH-0000RW-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:24:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CJxbj-00070R-4n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 16753 invoked by uid 65534); 19 Oct 2004 17:17:09 -0000 Original-Received: from p50843176.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO www2.gmx.net) (80.132.49.118) by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 19 Oct 2004 19:17:09 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14602519 Original-Received: from oak.pohoyda.family (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2.gmx.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9JHH3s0000477; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:17:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net) Original-Received: (from apog@localhost) by oak.pohoyda.family (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i9JHH3GR000474; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:17:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.pohoyda.family: apog set sender to alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net using -f Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28615 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28615 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > So what's the point in the whole discussion ? I thought that issuing a message makes no sense when how-many function is called from a LISP code. That was my bad idea to use (interactive-p) here. I'm sorry for this. My last patch does not use interactive-p. Do you see any other problems why it is not accepted yet? -- Alexander Pohoyda PGP Key fingerprint: 7F C9 CC 5A 75 CD 89 72 15 54 5F 62 20 23 C6 44