From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Cperl-mode does not highlight function names properly Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:01:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87wtsvntli.fsf@marant.org> References: <87fyzkgi70.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87r7j3spd4.fsf@marant.org> <87oee7fekf.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109437853 18349 80.91.229.2 (26 Feb 2005 17:10:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 26 18:10:53 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D55Sl-0008Ri-06 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:10:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D55kk-0002QI-8L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:29:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D55hc-0001b0-JO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D55hY-0001Z1-5K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:26:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D55hU-0001Rl-JD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:25:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.228.0.176] (helo=postfix4-2.free.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D55K9-0003PU-Gm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from amboise (unknown [82.227.97.206]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A562BEF83; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:01:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by amboise (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2AC8F2C03E; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:01:30 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <87oee7fekf.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:54:49 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:10808 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:10808 Stefan Monnier writes: >> Speaking of perl-mode, Richard told me that this mode is obsolete >> and shall be deprecated. What's his status? (we have a bunch of >> bug reports in the Debian BTS about it). > > Huh? It's the default perl-mode, and it's the one I've been using (and > improving) for the last few years. Try it (in its Emacs-CVS version) and > pass on the bug-reports. I know it and I've used it until Richard told be it was obsolete. I know it doesn't have such problems, at least for highlighting. I'll forwa= rd bug reports then. Should the I contact the cperl-mode maintainer directly about the current bug? Does he read the emacs lists? Cheers, --=20 J=E9r=F4me Marant http://marant.org