From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Risky local variable mechanism Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:12:34 -0500 Message-ID: <87wtgeu10d.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <200602011024.29973.jyavner@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138842548 5417 80.91.229.2 (2 Feb 2006 01:09:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 01:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 02 02:09:07 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4Sy6-0003T4-6a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:09:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4T1B-0002W7-1l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:12:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F4RBH-0001zx-GD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:14:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F4RBD-0001xx-TY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:14:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4RBC-0001xc-NL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:14:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.19.6.82] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F4R9w-0006JJ-5R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:13:08 -0500 Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 13A9A1208CD; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:12:34 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Jonathan Yavner In-Reply-To: <200602011024.29973.jyavner@member.fsf.org> (Jonathan Yavner's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:24:29 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49891 Archived-At: Jonathan Yavner writes: > Stefan wrote: >> Maybe "string and integer custom vars" are all safe, I don't know. > > No, sendmail-program is not safe, nor is max-eval-lisp-depth. We already treat as risky any variable names that match hooks, functions, forms, program, commands, predicates, fontlockkeywords, fontlockkeywords, fontlocksyntactickeywords, framealist, modealist, map, or mapalist.