From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs documentation. Was My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:37:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87wsuha781.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <711a73df0709230253p1d125c13qede773d03c75ad21@mail.gmail.com> <87hcllbppf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <711a73df0709230435g7f3d83c8w714f2c783643072@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190551066 30932 80.91.229.12 (23 Sep 2007 12:37:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "Dave Pawson" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 23 14:37:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IZQiK-0007OV-6g for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:37:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZQiH-0007Az-9o for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:37:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZQhy-00079d-RV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZQhw-00078P-N6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZQhw-00078D-EV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IZQhw-0003lQ-4j for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m4so797397uge for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 05:37:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=js/El+JZKbDrMQ3Y4RaJqNUR3KPAyUmFwj8DuixJsDg=; b=fjcg3P0QoeiixGUeowsvx+bBIHXWqYaVzv5Vvbi/6F+q991iDXklj6upRzMpOkD5J1+biFbtZL4Ve5oWF0syw4fHoVGcAWd6iNdXBWV7XKa+UPlJGhdjG0cTwvYZYwuedAFdrsZE0BHmTf1afvK7Xy2qmTN0xmN8CQX3WfPmu6g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=GcO3thlwc7xEX7oBfettdK0C6bGmdUR0AfGzdlCxFil9T6C/netdL4yT0LvLOv6rIJIlx2ynD2bEkK+Q94wgbdXsW8XLeWThwUlEsPEqlz0oNcyuT41C3Nxpd2y6V0F6HCt/uuKyk7TysT9Jx8F3XiUKfTxZi187rYBcbic9THs= Original-Received: by 10.66.220.17 with SMTP id s17mr6639093ugg.1190551026953; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 05:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [88.138.197.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x23sm2275263ugc.2007.09.23.05.37.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Sep 2007 05:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 81BAD157998; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:37:02 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <711a73df0709230435g7f3d83c8w714f2c783643072@mail.gmail.com> (Dave Pawson's message of "Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:35:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:47765 Archived-At: "Dave Pawson" writes: >> I guess too many developpers actually use Texinfo to document their >> code, and both users and developpers seem to be happy with that. > > You may be right. I think it is worth challenging though, otherwise > we'll never progress? Progress in itself doesn't say that much, it's rather a matter of where we want to progress to... -- Bastien