From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: howto show all todo's linked with some buffer in agenda? Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:36:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87wsu9sie6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87odfmwnzq.fsf@web.de> <87fy0y1ked.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87hcldwsrh.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IbcUs-00035y-Kc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:36:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IbcUq-000350-5o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:36:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbcUq-00034v-2c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:36:40 -0400 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.184]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IbcUp-00066r-Q4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:36:39 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so4398708fkr for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 06:36:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87hcldwsrh.fsf@web.de> (Jost Burkardt's message of "Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:38:58 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Jost Burkardt writes: >> One caveat though: file links contain context. Obviously, we don't want >> to be only able to find such links if the point is *exactly* where the >> context was defined from. So I suggest we get rid of the context when >> storing a link to the registry. Of course, not having a registry file >> would help here :) > > Similar problem may arise, when using bbdb links. Think of > [[bbdb:Ludwig Beethoven]] and [[bbdb:beethoven]] which should both be > matched, when I'm on the relevant entry. Maybe the search should do a > match against some kind of fingerprint of the current buffer. No idea, > about the impact on calculation time. Very true, I'll handle this as well. > What do you mean by plain links, links within the same buffer or links > without brackets? I think, it would be good to have all links, which > will be recognised by ord, in the registry (O.K., excluding internal > links). I mean links without brackets. For now the registry just skip them, because he's not able to decide whether this links are part of a full (bracketed) link or not. -- Bastien