From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window' Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:11:19 +0000 Message-ID: <87wsso907c.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ejexwf4m.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194797497 15249 80.91.229.12 (11 Nov 2007 16:11:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:11:37 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 11 17:11:42 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IrFPR-000597-Ro for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:11:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IrFPF-0007nC-Ov for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:11:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IrFPA-0007ks-9o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:11:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IrFP7-0007ik-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:11:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IrFP7-0007ic-4O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:11:21 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IrFP6-0002jq-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:11:21 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so682813ugf for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:11:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=wyA9S/xWnttEQggGaBLSe7EGLl3NuXEEomvi6AglEsg=; b=Bj9+92w0kJgUuKQGM2PFLYgeN0dl4OdX76ngEpOl7IZA24ns7BsbZcCLiuSJakxA3RUuPGelXW2+Byeu/VhVFKQntGlrQtRBvrd3p6Zp5txmriMtSmcPEilX0U398ajR08vVLOZ0AzfP+rgFpplfal+C5841WaiEbvOJyX6kWNE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=j/b06Q37pq/Qvdtpx7GYfodLHq2Gx0hCNAk+JJ++wPnMxuNiDv4sV3FH4Q4gVl68jefy6oJvk/aVMhMz6xN4/jtfmOZvUiTeNt4LQSYeHqDmTz9FrxsGNxnhY5z6EFCFuSDwaFrniTek7Dlc6r6dpZLqp8kfwo2sQQNQqbLk5Bo= Original-Received: by 10.67.103.12 with SMTP id f12mr1245334ugm.1194797479332; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:11:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [81.99.213.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y6sm3642597uge.2007.11.11.08.11.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:11:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F2391575BA; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:11:18 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:02:15 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82949 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Borders moving might be somewhat inconsistent, but I could find any easy >> way to predict the changes made by `shrink-window' and `enlarge-window' >> in all possible window configurations. Anyway, this should be accurate >> in 95% of the real-life cases, and I do agree that the resize-mode will >> be the most useful anyway. > > Have you tried to use `adjust-window-trailing-edge'? I didn't know about this, thanks! It's indeed much simpler to use this. -- Bastien