From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: time lag in re-scheduling the item in Agenda buffer Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 23:52:15 +0000 Message-ID: <87wsoihwsw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <47CDC0CE.7030909@gmail.com> <878x0yp0vy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <47CDD1C3.7050807@cornell.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWgvk-00033F-VH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:52:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWgvi-000333-Ge for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:52:19 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWgvi-000330-C6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:52:18 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWgvh-0005ad-TM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:52:18 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1039940fga.30 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:52:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <47CDD1C3.7050807@cornell.edu> (Xin Shi's message of "Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:48:35 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Xin Shi Cc: org-mode mailing list Xin Shi writes: > I'm using the 5.22a version. When I view the agenda in the buffer, I use > keyboard C-c C-s to re-schedule some items. It first gives a "nil" in the > min-buffer, and after about 2 or 3 seconds gives me the calendar to > choose. It looks like slow compared with doing the same thing in the .org > file on those items. Are there any reason for that or to make it a little > bit faster? This was a bug -- fixed, thanks. -- Bastien