From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Getting full bug database dump? Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:21:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87wrzkogph.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <87k4vkltop.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263483617 23041 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 15:40:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 16:40:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVRmV-0001cD-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:38:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51105 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRmW-00056x-AV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:38:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRVn-00072m-Bu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:21:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRVh-0006xk-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:21:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40025 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRVg-0006xT-OC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:21:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:41565) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVRVg-0005Pw-5o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:21:20 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2010 15:21:16 -0000 Original-Received: from p4FC00DB3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO LKG29808F.local) [79.192.13.179] by mail.gmx.net (mp049) with SMTP; 14 Jan 2010 16:21:16 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+4uHltO/K4pEMoPs9z8Xldy4qUydIY1KtxTXw4Jd MWnubVxW2R7T0U User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.67000000000000004 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119996 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: > Savannah admins don't maintain debbugs, right? Does anyone know the > right place to ask for such data? Debbugs has a SOAP interface. Via this, you can retrieve bug data in XML format. A while ago, I've started to write a package xesam-debbugs.el. It ask interactively for a filter of the bugs, retrieves them via the SOAP interface, and displays them in a buffer. Everything asynchronously, Emacs is not blocked. The package is unfinished. I lost interested when I found out, that the SOAP interface of debbugs does not support sorting (which is inconvenient for a larger number of bugs returned). However, it might be worth to continue the work? > Thank you, > -Karl Best regards, Michael.