From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Official Git mirror? Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 06:36:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87wrkuhrtb.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <83fwritmmx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298266671 29356 80.91.229.12 (21 Feb 2011 05:37:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:37:51 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 21 06:37:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PrOSw-0002pd-FM for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 06:37:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46692 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PrOSv-00030O-Uf for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:37:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56650 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PrOSF-00030H-DX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrOSE-0004CB-1F for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59465) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrOSD-0004Bw-Ie for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PrOSB-0002dQ-0T for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 06:36:59 +0100 Original-Received: from 103.red-79-150-239.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([79.150.239.103]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 06:36:59 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 103.red-79-150-239.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 06:36:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 42 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 103.red-79-150-239.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UlV4OZH66bqtVAK7q0KWhc7IMOo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:79276 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: "Oleksandr Gavenko (aka gavenkoa)" >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:11:16 +0200 >> >> As Bzr have network inefficient protocol I search for Git mirror. > > Bzr is no less efficient than Git. If the initial checkout is slow, > try one of these two, for the first "bzr branch" command only: > > bzr branch nosmart+bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk > > bzr branch lp:emacs oscar@qcore:~/dev/ff$ time bzr branch lp:emacs Branched 103368 revision(s). real 17m41.424s user 7m56.250s sys 0m8.240s oscar@qcore:~/dev/ff/git-emacs$ time git clone git://repo.or.cz/emacs.git git-emacs Initialized empty Git repository in /home/oscar/dev/ff/git-emacs/git-emacs/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 597983, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (122520/122520), done. remote: Total 597983 (delta 474994), reused 597778 (delta 474826) Receiving objects: 100% (597983/597983), 521.43 MiB | 1.00 MiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (474994/474994), done. real 11m42.616s user 2m36.630s sys 0m14.820s Please note that git downloads all 51 branches that exists or existed on Savannah while bzr gets just `trunk'. Git keeps the pipe downloading data at full speed all the time, while bzr fluctuates a lot, including several long pauses, possibly because the server is doing some CPU-intensive work for preparing the data. Maybe the differences are not big enough to notice by most people that update their Emacs mirrors from time to time, but it is not accurate to say that bzr's network protocol is no less efficient than git.