From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rasmus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Getting Hunspell working properly in Linux Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:36:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87wrdgq8b6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4E625F6A.3000307@gmail.com> <87obz1tmy2.fsf@gmail.com> <877h5gwj2a.fsf@mithlond.arda> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315697684 18059 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2011 23:34:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:34:44 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 01:34:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2X4J-0005N6-Tq for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:34:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32896 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2X4J-0000fh-AD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:34:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42261) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2X4E-0000fX-Kv for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:34:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2X4C-0004b6-SL for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:34:34 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2X4C-0004aF-GK for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:34:32 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2X4A-0005KV-OE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:34:30 +0200 Original-Received: from 0x555293e1.adsl.cybercity.dk ([85.82.147.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:34:30 +0200 Original-Received: from rasmus by 0x555293e1.adsl.cybercity.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:34:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 43 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 0x555293e1.adsl.cybercity.dk User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAAAAAByaaZbAAAAAmJLR0QA/4ePzL8AAAAJcEhZ cwAAAEgAAABIAEbJaz4AAAHKSURBVEjHlZTLlexACENnf3NRLiRCLmSiUBQR5y08v3Z73P1Y2nWr EAg+9iZ88e3j5nzqfwHlXeDIxbwN9OzuNn4bqN1EeDd5Byit25Ck/AKY7BpFXZRlXgBduxHTtBhp 6HsA7Q4yjKrRULdAwDPUgKsahXqUfX6hqCr3oGQaPC3fihZNxTC7A+1+VPEEmIYEDvXYemj4cx+q oVcwG8FsvwDc0BFoB5i17oEIKlTRqsI+jHUDIFXTDaQwk3vAjCRmoKI+W/bqBRcQQ5niNBRXGmag Nx4PvDLf7pbSjsfOPrn7CshkhCSp5p2Jy0jjHD2pvASsrzSyu65XI+o+TsQFnSfiCfiyZgMg79Tt APUcqaQ4wtt/2zvzq01uAZB9KO3H47ih37wbqMeV+Rs4fp+2TtWxSq6AuQAORZrrlFrnLfTt4FxX yVfrd3e36rpKZ+/kx/O5TKkfalyi8klJF8Dvac9nF/BuPCWegZ+Esj5mFNBXA8+AC8q7G7ta0F/m +IwTYJgB1bR6nBHcAUFZAQMV+8sXfwKmNwDHxYp7T4+cAWVbqq4qdTKu+5S+TTH+Xpj8PPkseqA9 MzPjJE/3P5e1eREnDeL/AHgX+Ac1wLS1jG2Y1gAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Cancel-Lock: sha1:etvpUUY6ldJ3nJ7XqXIGqRk5Cc4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:82207 Archived-At: Hi Teemu, >> I use wcheck > > Me too. I would have taken you for a hardcore ispell.el'er :) > I see that you are using an old version of wcheck-mode. There's nothing > wrong with that. I'll just point out that the version released a couple > of months ago has more versatile wcheck-actions feature that supersedes > wcheck-spelling-suggestions. Any kind of actions can be programmed for > marked text, not just spelling suggestions. Configuring for Ispell-like > spelling suggestions is still pretty much the same. Thanks for pointing out the new wcheck version. I'd totally missed it. I have been playing a little bit with wcheck, and I have a question. Is it possible to combine dictionaries? For example combining a whitespace dictionary with a human language dictionary? I have been trying to mix up an English+ dictionary which would not only offer spelling suggestions, but also highlight lack of double-space after periods etc. If two dictionaries can be activated simultaneously it would probably be easy to combine a regexp dictionary and an enchant dictionary, but this does not seem possible. From wcheck-language-data-defaults it also seems that the regexp fields are used for other stuff by default. Do you have any good ideas on how to archive this? Thanks for wcheck! –Rasmus -- Sent from my Emacs