From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lawrence Mitchell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9610: 24.0.90; org-mode: sluggish response and high CPU utilization with large .org files Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:10:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87wrcum36m.fsf__21958.9184540839$1317136295$gmane$org@gmx.li> References: <20110927024957.GP23695@srevilak.net> <20110927134744.GA959__30964.7548631348$1317134682$gmane$org@KAYAK.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317136295 28780 80.91.229.12 (27 Sep 2011 15:11:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:11:35 +0000 (UTC) To: 9610@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 27 17:11:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZJi-0002CM-N4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:11:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60916 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZJi-0001u0-1g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:11:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZJe-0001rN-U9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:11:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZJV-0003Az-Kw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:11:26 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55056) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZJQ-0003AJ-LG; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZKE-0001AH-47; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20110927024957.GP23695@srevilak.net> Resent-From: Lawrence Mitchell Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9610 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13171363034452 (code B ref -1); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2011 15:11:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZJu-00019l-OX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:11:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZJp-00019a-Rg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:11:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZJ0-00037o-U8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:10:48 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:58473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZJ0-00037k-Sh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZIw-0001Nk-Pv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZIs-000371-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:10:42 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZIs-00036v-L9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8ZIq-0001hF-64 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:10:36 +0200 Original-Received: from e4300lm.epcc.ed.ac.uk ([129.215.63.156]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:10:36 +0200 Original-Received: from wence by e4300lm.epcc.ed.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:10:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e4300lm.epcc.ed.ac.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Gw+128J3kALChx/X+bMFNVFajyI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:12:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51919 Archived-At: Steve Revilak wrote: >>> I'd like to report an org-mode regression issue. When working with >>> large .org files, Emacs 24.0.90 becomes sluggish, and consumes large >>> amounts of CPU. >> If you type this: >> M-x set-variable RET bidi-paragraph-direction RET left-to-right RET >> does the problem go away? > My bug report contained two scenarios to produce sluggish response and > high CPU utilization. These scenarios were > (1) move point to the end of buffer, and start typing > (2) Put point in line 1, column zero; press and hold the down (then up) > arrows to move point down (then up) the org-mode buffer. > Setting bidi-paragraph-direction: left-to-right eliminates the problem > with scenario (1). However, it has no effect on scenario (2). Setting bidi-display-reordering to nil in the buffer has the effect that moving point is no longer jerky for me. Lawrence