From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Burton Samograd Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: most-positive-float, most-negative-float coming up nil Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:31:30 -0600 Message-ID: <87wrbt9gnx.fsf@interalia.com> References: <877h3tawq3.fsf@interalia.com> <81r521avzf.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319560390 20049 80.91.229.12 (25 Oct 2011 16:33:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:33:10 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 18:33:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RIjw2-0004Bz-TQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:33:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41351 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIjw2-0001EK-AE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIjvx-0001DW-5G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIjvr-0008PS-8E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:33:01 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:54206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIjvq-0008PE-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:32:55 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RIjvk-0003xx-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:32:48 +0200 Original-Received: from 209.89.22.115 ([209.89.22.115]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:32:48 +0200 Original-Received: from bsamograd by 209.89.22.115 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:32:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.89.22.115 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7uVgsB8Du0M4s8aOe28HdsPqQoM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145523 Archived-At: I did not (require 'cl) during my testing so I never thought of looking there. Looks like something I have loaded in my .emacs file does. It seems odd that most-positive/negative-fixnum are standard in emacs lisp but not the float versions without requiring cl (plus requiring an additional function to be called to initialize them is even more odd). It's not like floats aren't a standard part of the emacs lisp language. -- Burton Samograd