From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [EXPERIMENTAL PATCH] Extending Isearch-repeat-forward/backward to
	support a prefix argument following suggesion by Juri Linkov
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:53:29 +0200
Organization: JURTA
Message-ID: <87wr88lt1i.fsf@mail.jurta.org>
References: <CAJzWQ4fcfXsDdtaRq4DDjd=L712iXzCH3VNf218UZLqO-SGghA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pqe5x6ju.fsf@mail.jurta.org>
	<CAJzWQ4exnqaN=PNeev8SgHZpGdThH5dbdExJ0N09jVa8qXBn0A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ty3h2uvp.fsf@mail.jurta.org>
	<CAJzWQ4d4LPrG29=e2Rq19AZ2T-JJ+3gbWmZ-KvT8oRjPS0X1Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r4yiav0w.fsf@mail.jurta.org>
	<CAJzWQ4fAgeotNoevyG=8pkH7P-d4h4=xdsWzXz8ujN3dueUVqg@mail.gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327965008 18412 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2012 23:10:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:10:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Gideon Stupp <gideon.stupp@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 00:10:07 2012
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Rs0MQ-0002cS-OW
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:10:06 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45561 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Rs0MM-0007lK-He
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:10:02 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52756)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <juri@jurta.org>) id 1Rs0MJ-0007ku-EF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:10:00 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <juri@jurta.org>) id 1Rs0MI-0004We-4y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:09:59 -0500
Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:57249
	helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <juri@jurta.org>) id 1Rs0MH-0004W4-SF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:09:58 -0500
Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105])
	by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4274451C816;
	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:08:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJzWQ4fAgeotNoevyG=8pkH7P-d4h4=xdsWzXz8ujN3dueUVqg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Gideon Stupp's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:53:33 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
	recognized.
X-Received-From: 69.163.218.105
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148054
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/148054>

> So how about the following behavior (for brevity I will describe only
> isearch-repeat-forward): (1) if you use isearch-repeat-forward then at
> the end of the operation you must be in a search-forward state; (2)
> the numerical value decides how many searches are done and (3) the
> sign defines the direction.

Thanks.  I agree that these rules are reasonable.