From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [h-e-w] Emacs 24.0.93 Pretest Windows Binaries published Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:49:59 +0900 Message-ID: <87wr84yqk8.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <4F25FA2F.2010401@gmail.com> <8362fofi8h.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkd0z11q.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83zkd0dx91.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328277038 15605 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2012 13:50:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rmh@temple.edu, cschol2112@googlemail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 03 14:50:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtJX8-0000TC-L3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:50:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtJX7-0001Gn-Rg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:50:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtJWz-0001GU-SW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:50:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtJWu-0005wN-7m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:50:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:53285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtJWk-0005o7-RJ; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:50:11 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC819707DD; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:49:59 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA9491A282A; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:49:59 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <83zkd0dx91.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta31) "ginger" e6b5c49f9e13 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148148 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I don't know about Symantec (don't use their products), but with AVG > it works as expected: you submit the offending file for their > analysis, via the GUI of the antivirus program, and get an email > notification, usually within hours, saying that it's a false alarm; > and the virus database is updated within a couple of days accordingly. That's what I would expect from Symantec, too. But "submit the file and get it fixed in a few days" is not what I understood from your post. "Get your act together" implies "you shouldn't be making mistakes like this in the first place", not "I understand these things happen, but you made a mistake here, please fix it." I think they /should/ get their act together, but I'm not gonna hold my breath.