From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vitalie Spinu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: web-mode.El Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:41:12 +0200 Organization: EUR Message-ID: <87wr38vrnr.fsf_-_@gmail.com> References: <4FD9313D.70303@yandex.ru> <871ulh3rdt.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339753291 24967 80.91.229.3 (15 Jun 2012 09:41:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Dmitry Gutov To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 15 11:41:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SfT21-0008Uk-4S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:41:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34955 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SfT21-000431-3h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:41:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SfT1x-00042u-PR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:41:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SfT1w-0007VP-0k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:41:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:33133) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SfT1p-0007UV-NR; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:41:17 -0400 Original-Received: by wefh52 with SMTP id h52so2520320wef.0 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 02:41:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=poGEybjm5SJjvyc69NA5eZbq4Mdmnp88eQ4omq6ZYdE=; b=Gysawa0+f6mUHJHuJu8cmypZwaE9dBvw3aDE9Br2gzdrBYiTJJLX4f08D6yVsZQicc tCbe+Z4tkVuEVKe3nDTDFFc7DZxFXj7pdhqrbjTkDBpz1WBDg0W6ry9tTTuywrjCCPVf GWlk1fkM1QijQ+A4UhyPM29fMSJifGhTZGWYUFm3anEKo6wYlB+ftgpg1jH7zM3z+hai H2GvatbLs3a9hV6S7bsJh1RCcXaS4reuihNBxhUt9mG7UYWvM/hXLVbKsQtyZ9QJlt8f bst1yspxvYLYrsszqf5ABz+JD1DAYoN8p2v7SeyVJKt+HJiqVdGbFofzQL/cwMRBCh3e I7QA== Original-Received: by 10.181.13.235 with SMTP id fb11mr2967049wid.3.1339753274855; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 02:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([130.115.115.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q6sm2498293wiy.0.2012.06.15.02.41.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 02:41:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:23:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150960 Archived-At: >> Lennart Borgman >> on Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:23:31 +0200 wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Vitalie Spinu wrote: >> >> Dmitry suggested collecting test cases. That would be great for >> comparing multi modes head to head. Where can I find really difficult >> ones? > I have been collecting some test cases from the bug reports to > nXhtml/MuMaMo. There are unit tests for most of them. > Those tests are distributed with nXhtml (and there are even menu > entries to run them). Please look at the versions in the repository: > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~nxhtml/nxhtml/main/files/head:/tests/ Wow! That's huge collection of examples and test suites. Thanks. > Perhaps you want to try to generalize the unit tests to work for other > multi major mode frameworks too? That's a good idea. Will look into it. Vitalie.