From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16178: 24.3.50; eww: S-SPC scrolls downward not upward Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:41:00 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87wqj19183.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <0A8A4608-0A60-4151-8DBD-F6AA7133F37F@ifi.uio.no> <87zjnztbta.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387410193 24116 80.91.229.3 (18 Dec 2013 23:43:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16178@debbugs.gnu.org, rudi@ifi.uio.no To: Josh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 19 00:43:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VtQlq-0008Ox-2w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:43:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41312 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtQlp-0000iZ-Nk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:43:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtQlh-0000hR-Hc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:43:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtQlb-00033J-He for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:43:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtQlb-00033E-E8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:43:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VtQla-00046f-Vb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:43:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16178 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16178-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16178.138741013515720 (code B ref 16178); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16178) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2013 23:42:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57862 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VtQko-00045U-Tz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:42:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [69.163.184.122] (port=43615 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VtQkl-00045I-Nt for 16178@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:42:12 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost.jurta.org (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.184.122]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24C7301412A24; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:42:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (josh@foxtail.org's message of "Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:27:02 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82198 Archived-At: > It would be nice if the key bindings for Info-mode and help-mode > were more consistent. Since both "l" and "r" are currently > unbound in help-mode, would this be an opportune time to bind them > to `help-go-back' and `help-go-forward' respectively? I recall a discussion about this, and strangely was done until now. But better late than early.