From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About the :distant-foreground face attribute Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:21:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87wqi5v1ae.fsf@engster.org> References: <87bnzo9cja.fsf@gnu.org> <59B7E7FC-48D0-4737-B1BB-FFAC5BA9E07A@swipnet.se> <874n5f3162.fsf@gnu.org> <83fvozf86g.fsf@gnu.org> <87r48javwe.fsf@gnu.org> <83bnzmfjxe.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnzlyvwb.fsf@gnu.org> <83wqi9cakl.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjn5584t.fsf@gnu.org> <8738kwydon.fsf@engster.org> <871u0dwiyv.fsf@engster.org> <0BD35771-1C3E-4108-8DBA-DF4ACD3FA7CB@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389529296 10570 80.91.229.3 (12 Jan 2014 12:21:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Chong Yidong , Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , emacs-devel To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 12 13:21:41 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W2K2v-0000Zf-9y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:21:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37477 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2K2u-0001Fc-Ri for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 07:21:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2K2m-0001FU-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 07:21:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2K2g-0004Dc-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 07:21:32 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:42525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2K2g-0004DW-Lq; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 07:21:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=/ey/IzvRPmJv+pPg1EfBgWta2yDdpj6BqKYWJpwMSL0=; b=lpAnK1+/uYesmiKzbRdNO/0YK+YN3mMYtQJpQEaS1e6+XE18UyngJUn+czltvc/sXlH605QePLDUWkmNs6o11cSN9X7K7BJ0N/o+z+atqN+odJCyBBs4rgdnwfR6VdJS; Original-Received: from dslc-082-083-037-052.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.37.52] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W2K2d-00030l-35; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:21:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <0BD35771-1C3E-4108-8DBA-DF4ACD3FA7CB@swipnet.se> ("Jan \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Dj\=E4rv\=22's\?\= message of "Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:40:42 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= , Chong Yidong , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , emacs-devel X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 5.45.97.173 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168170 Archived-At: Jan Dj=E4rv writes: > 12 jan 2014 kl. 12:14 skrev David Engster : > >> David Engster writes: >>> I'm wondering: We already can set different face attributes depending on >>> DISPLAY's 'background' property, which can be 'light' or 'dark'. Say the >>> user is working with a 'dark' background by default, but we now detect >>> that one of the font-lock faces has not enough contrast when highlighted >>> by the region: why not simply switch to the face that is defined for >>> 'light' background instead? >>=20 >> Hey look, a tumbleweed! >>=20 >> I'm assuming everybody's simply stunned by my ingenious proposal? >>=20 > > A theme does not have to suppy colors for properties light or dark. So? It also does not have to supply the distant-foreground attribute. -David