From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:10:28 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87wqhvt9gb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87fvqtg02v.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87txe364q0.fsf@yandex.ru> <87r497fu0h.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87haa1litl.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y53czx7e.fsf@yandex.ru> <87bo08bivm.fsf_-_@flea.lifelogs.com> <87sitkzahs.fsf@yandex.ru> <52D7DAAB.2070709@yandex.ru> <52D81960.2080408@yandex.ru> <52DA8C17.4080707@yandex.ru> <52DC00E5.3020803@yandex.ru> <52DC6A26.3020003@yandex.ru> <87k3dv9z85.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87eh439w1n.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390201855 19126 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2014 07:10:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:10:55 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 20 08:10:58 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W590b-0007y0-6g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:10:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49057 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W590a-0001kM-MW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:10:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W590S-0001jw-Ax for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:10:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W590M-0001tN-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:10:48 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W590M-0001tF-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:10:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W590K-0007rP-U1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:10:40 +0100 Original-Received: from x2f52729.dyn.telefonica.de ([2.245.39.41]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:10:40 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by x2f52729.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:10:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: x2f52729.dyn.telefonica.de X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+gtyV/ZAPoSBUu4QYJkVh1L5/9Q= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168768 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > John Yates writes: > > > RMS may have an inflated sense of the extent to which the greater > > compiler community (those developing and those using compilers) > > value gcc over clang / llvm. > > RMS doesn't care about "greater communities", AFAICT. He cares about > the free software community (more or less, the GPL-using community), > and about preserving a haven for freedom for all users. Yes. Free Software was never about winning popularity contests. It was about being available to those who care. -- David Kastrup