From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthew Carter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 02:25:18 -0500 Organization: Ahungry (http://ahungry.com) Message-ID: <87wq3ub2u9.fsf@ahungry.com> References: <87386ifb0x.fsf@violet.siamics.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423296915 11973 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2015 08:15:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:15:15 +0000 (UTC) To: 19791@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 07 09:15:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YK0Xp-0004KU-DK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:15:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51688 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK0Xo-0007oL-P8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:15:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK0Xk-0007k7-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK0Xg-00016z-F6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:15:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK0Xg-00016p-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:15:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YK0Xg-0001FG-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:15:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Matthew Carter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:15:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19791 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19791-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19791.14232968554688 (code B ref 19791); Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:15:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2015 08:14:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36057 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YK0Ws-0001DX-By for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:14:15 -0500 Original-Received: from li130-200.members.linode.com ([69.164.215.200]:59561 helo=mail.ahungry.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJzld-0008W7-4E for 19791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 02:25:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Prometheus (99-40-9-245.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.40.9.245]) by mail.ahungry.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD869481E for <19791@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 02:25:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87386ifb0x.fsf@violet.siamics.net> (Ivan Shmakov's message of "Sat, 07 Feb 2015 07:14:54 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:14:11 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99120 Archived-At: Ivan Shmakov writes: >>>>>> Stefan Monnier writes: > > >> It specifies black letters, but it's a bug to blindly obey that. > > > Unless it specified this color specifically because it wanted the > > text to be invisible. > > Except that the user should be free to override that. > > The =E2=80=9Cmajor=E2=80=9D browsers already allow that, e.=C2=A0g., via= the Stylish > extension (see [1, 2]), and I believe that EWW should re-use > their approach; namely: a. support proper CSS cascading; > b. allow for custom (user-defined) styles. > > That being said, being myself a user of EWW on a 16-color > Linux tty, I don=E2=80=99t see much value in trying to render > HTML-specified colors, anyway. I=E2=80=99ve just disabled the feature > over a year ago, =E2=80=93 and never wanted it back. > > [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/stylish/ > [2] https://userstyles.org/ Is there a way to disable background colors while leaving font colors in-tact? I hate having the background colored (either the full screen or behind text), but a little color on the words is nice in my opinion (I use a 256 color tty). --=20 Matthew Carter (m@ahungry.com) http://ahungry.com