From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20960: handling /etc/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt by default in emacs Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:57:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87wps1orm3.fsf@gnus.org> References: <55950B13.1040406@redhat.com> <83d20a1udy.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451163502 12939 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2015 20:58:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20960@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 21:58:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvuh-0004Lg-TT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:58:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39832 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvuh-0004bT-4v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:58:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvud-0004bL-9V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:58:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvuc-0005AP-7I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34586) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvuc-0005AE-3u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvub-0008Md-N5; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:58:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20960 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20960-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20960.145116347532138 (code B ref 20960); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20960) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2015 20:57:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42188 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvuV-0008MI-30 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:57:55 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:57113) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvuT-0008MA-Fp for 20960@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:57:54 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aCvu1-000507-VU; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:57:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:25:23 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aCvu1-000507-VU MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451768246.24934@8+aUU1kEuFiKQU5VaY+O8Q X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110741 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> that exists, similar to what gnutls-trustfiles does. (Do these two >> variables duplicate each other?) > > Yes, I believe they are duplicates (with smime-CA-directory predating > the gnutls thingy). smime-CA-directory should be rewritten to use gnutls-trustfiles (if gnutls-trustfiles exists). The minor complication is that the former is a directory and the latter is a list of files, so it wouldn't be exactly backwards compatible... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no