From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22680: 25.0.91; Background colour sometimes not displayed when no foreground text (in shr?) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:10:19 -0400 Message-ID: <87wpq4mn6c.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87oabif3v0.fsf@gmail.com> <87egcd5g7h.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455653491 7008 80.91.229.3 (16 Feb 2016 20:11:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22680@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 16 21:11:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlxs-0004Le-5L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:11:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50335 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlxr-0001XF-51 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:11:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlxn-0001X0-2U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:11:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlxe-0006pW-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39769) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlxe-0006pK-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlxe-0002Kl-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22680 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 22680-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22680.14556534308932 (code B ref 22680); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22680) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2016 20:10:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlx7-0002K0-Tg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:10:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:33122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVlx5-0002Jn-NX for 22680@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:10:28 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id z135so136442454iof.0 for <22680@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:10:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=TjAfwe6S0RJJr8SJBkvL8pbcfUiFHS2QmI4ZZUiQmtA=; b=q2yvMg0f5zIVWeA7QFOFxQVbf2/9wRiw0Hp5jvyFs7eSvs25P9enl7nAPSi63TS+Jp vrXzfd1kje5b01P/e0xZ0JdaK3THh5mWZXSBk0drjnB8/7iqjWmNo/MjYvzGqzrIJIMS djQJjuzMqqtyPR2K0qRunVrSCXWwNTI97Upozwv9uLyMKRrCj14mELmL0wbgwe4Mhurs GpMUFCLmBug7DGdMguT14UKxl05EqgkP6sueJSMI7s9pHfx0ULkZlDjRgxdKBbnt56d+ tWjOb59/2Pql/NkMFMOzZ7AZ+7ppud/6os5esnVRIumau05spZGnQYtcPz1QMIHevVw9 6CBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=TjAfwe6S0RJJr8SJBkvL8pbcfUiFHS2QmI4ZZUiQmtA=; b=XTmbluMUL11qFmfxboHMU4QK61dz9SQWV+JKS/azRgrQtrgNIKwz0eR9kzADCUnFd8 IpmTdG3szQ179J2U33+4A4P2p3C1VWzt5+B8QudDJ0rwHn4GpX1Wo4uo8NiY2PWMfRRW mwYPd4CAgg0kFmBGdUN7/LNyVFvW4SPzA+2SO4iCjjkRZTobBxoNsTTDNGdFxPlYFNHM QGvj5vM9NqEOpP2QLQrXMdeOf0H5dNuEkll/P2kyEdWhqDhQdTjsYq0YKwD3fhvdH2RA Zfwf0Sh9is2IfsslySEmASOyWy85UmeRJpOHe0CXpv8KLj2oYjYGZvtVJPs7n0PggXQb DiWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSQTi/2i3FfJ22HPYziAAuiyx5pOZ/xXo+Ba16LAJEiEoNlJMQB+GxpTTHdbPhkUA== X-Received: by 10.107.128.21 with SMTP id b21mr27552870iod.143.1455653422266; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:10:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from moondust.nodomain.none ([142.227.16.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o201sm14496863ioe.15.2016.02.16.12.10.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:10:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87egcd5g7h.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:20:34 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113151 Archived-At: Hi Lars, At 17:20 +1100 on Tuesday 2016-02-16, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I'm unable to reproduce this on the emacs-25 branch. What commit are > you up to? That was on the second pretest (25.0.91) from the tarball, obtained from ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/emacs-25.0.91.tar.xz and downloaded at 2016-02-14.13:42 -0400. [I guess that's why report-emacs-bug didn't include a commit number?] I don't know how to find out the commit number it corresponds to, but that pretest was announced 2016-02-13.20:52 +0100 so I suppose it corresponds to the state of emacs-25 a few hours before that. As you closed bug http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22547 on 2016-02-09, I assumed that the new pretest would include your fix. In any case, I checked out emacs-25 from savannah this afternoon (revision: 106b5bb68dc2ff0776b920a7f31ffc3b17ef8013), and I still see the problem shown in the Example 3 and Example 4 screenshots. What additional information should I provide? Thanks. N.