From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21728: 25.0.50; [patch] mention focus-{in,out}-hook in manual Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:31:47 +1100 Message-ID: <87wppwyou4.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87lhawys61.fsf@gmail.com> <83eggouk0f.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456205610 7418 80.91.229.3 (23 Feb 2016 05:33:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Aaron Ecay , 21728-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 23 06:33:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aY5b1-0002KH-Il for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:33:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54003 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aY5ax-0000fZ-OT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:33:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56865) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aY5at-0000f2-Ra for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:33:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aY5ap-00049M-Rc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:33:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aY5ap-00048T-OU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:33:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aY5ao-00007D-I4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:33:02 -0500 Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 21728 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 21728@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, aaronecay@gmail.com Original-Received: via spool by 21728-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D21728.1456205538380 (code D ref 21728); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21728-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2016 05:32:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aY5a6-000064-9l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:32:18 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:38199) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aY5a4-00005x-Qh for 21728-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:32:17 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aY5Zf-0001QQ-TN; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:31:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83eggouk0f.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:57:52 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aY5Zf-0001QQ-TN MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1456810314.22217@NKzLV+3LZkFrHpbmTXp+eA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113524 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > No, they are also mentioned in the node "Input Focus". And the node > "Focus Events", where you suggested the addition, has a > cross-reference to "Input Focus", near its beginning. So perhaps what > we need is a sentence near that cross-reference that somehow mentions > these two hooks, and all the rest is already in place? Would you like > to suggest an alternative patch along these lines? Hm... is that really necessary, though? With that xref it seems pretty clear that the user should go to that node for more info on everything connected with input focus, I think... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no