From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: Mobile Org startgroup [8.3.4 (8.3.4-93-g0d72c3-elpaplus @
 c:/USR/FJM/APP/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160627/)]
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 22:57:45 +0200
Message-ID: <87wpkyfprq.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
References: <e9440ac7-0193-b01d-5b60-9fbd0f66b3b9@juno.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41737)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bKttO-00013h-Im
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 16:57:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bKttJ-0000Wp-Kz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 16:57:57 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:43457)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bKttJ-0000WF-DP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 16:57:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <e9440ac7-0193-b01d-5b60-9fbd0f66b3b9@juno.com> (Francis J.
	Monari's message of "Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:18:27 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: "Francis J. Monari, Esquire" <monarifj.esq@juno.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

"Francis J. Monari, Esquire" <monarifj.esq@juno.com> writes:

> = Is there any down-side to this patch?  (My knowledge of LiSP and Org
> is very limited.)
> = If appropriate, can the source code be patched?

First, could you try Org development version and see if this bug is
fixed?

Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou