From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Subject: Re: Bug: Mobile Org startgroup [8.3.4 (8.3.4-93-g0d72c3-elpaplus @ c:/USR/FJM/APP/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160627/)] Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 22:57:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87wpkyfprq.fsf@saiph.selenimh> References: <e9440ac7-0193-b01d-5b60-9fbd0f66b3b9@juno.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41737) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bKttO-00013h-Im for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 16:57:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bKttJ-0000Wp-Kz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 16:57:57 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:43457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bKttJ-0000WF-DP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 16:57:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <e9440ac7-0193-b01d-5b60-9fbd0f66b3b9@juno.com> (Francis J. Monari's message of "Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:18:27 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>, <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>, <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> To: "Francis J. Monari, Esquire" <monarifj.esq@juno.com> Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, "Francis J. Monari, Esquire" <monarifj.esq@juno.com> writes: > = Is there any down-side to this patch? (My knowledge of LiSP and Org > is very limited.) > = If appropriate, can the source code be patched? First, could you try Org development version and see if this bug is fixed? Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou