From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Development suggestions from an ENSIME developer Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:40:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87wpke3kdj.fsf@russet.org.uk> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469128382 4387 80.91.229.3 (21 Jul 2016 19:13:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 21 21:12:51 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bQJOt-0004Ax-1B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:12:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43080 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQJOs-0000E9-8R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:12:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQItd-0005Ep-GN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:40:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQItX-0004L0-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:40:32 -0400 Original-Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com ([31.216.48.48]:33872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQItX-0004Ku-2N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:40:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russet.org.uk; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=0MJnUY7StKXishACJvgfgsxgARjYgo0HcR3somvx3Gg=; b=e+8pLbyL0Q61Y5gXW1WNFhAgeK yBOGk1HYPXJTBLvIbTCbdIG47HkAV8/lsHcSBwoAncVLdNbIGGrE7iWBByp8tQhNvmd49UAhsAQHH 4GSVJB27zTU6oFYVbt5tfJdEecJ5PgU6a47r8i2EAXpRjKO0XoO4ryeVCnQWBgp8Oke/tKEzYfKW5 Q03dV6ZsGT+qW1jyKbsIil+AKcdiDha50FUgjYfa3dnoWVkeaDSa5aU0P7yCrR55Rz3xYbGNQu7UO pNutv4fDNRnsO2Hcl4qjXB7DrN9KPQ2ElLbJfZyIi9hd9VTLbwA+6GX703h1obYWAXBgaWVr7Rq1e C5dEMNpg==; Original-Received: from cpc1-benw10-2-0-cust373.gate.cable.virginm.net ([77.98.219.118]:52595 helo=russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1bQItV-000z4s-R4; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:40:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:00:13 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cloud103.planethippo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - russet.org.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cloud103.planethippo.com: authenticated_id: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cloud103.planethippo.com: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 31.216.48.48 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205985 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I'm just posting the link here because I found it mildly interesting, >> although I don't really find any of the technical suggestions to be >> very... er... convincing. Your mileage may vary. > > I'd be really happy to have some kind of system that can manage a queue > of pull-requests. Even better if I can manage it when I'm not online. I'm willing to put a little work into scoping the alternatives. As a relatively new contributor, I think, this would be a change that would significantly help. It's just much easier to track what is being said wrt a PR than passing patches around. There needs to be the willingness to adopt it, if we choose something, though. If this is clear, I think, we might be able to get some others to help in the process. Phil