From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19737: 24.4; Shift selection misses beginning of region Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:13:50 -0400 Message-ID: <87wpjlwpg1.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <874mc2g9cr.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471043664 4200 195.159.176.226 (12 Aug 2016 23:14:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 23:14:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 19737@debbugs.gnu.org, Ullrich , Stefan Monnier To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 13 01:14:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bYLeb-0000ms-KC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 01:14:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55216 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYLeY-0002TP-Hm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:14:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYLeS-0002SQ-5z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYLeM-0004Wc-40 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYLeM-0004WY-09 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bYLeL-0000wK-NX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:14:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 23:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19737 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19737-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19737.14710436293583 (code B ref 19737); Fri, 12 Aug 2016 23:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2016 23:13:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55558 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bYLe9-0000vf-50 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:13:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:36657) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bYLe7-0000vM-IZ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:13:48 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id b62so37740231iod.3; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:13:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=swLHGVEBlIGOMERxYpSSTJzeZSyVbzPg9dI3qdLm/EM=; b=Z+bZ0XKEAPC41V6LorVAvlIyMbGd6Dbp3OLogpg0v4GfkHMY3wc857bWl1O7a1BCaz aEZsH3bwlDWo9aTQx7uKSTASTvK306agwmT6ztu15l38n1U+CGkCUXpVPAPt7nitKqjB j4vJRNDM653PLCsXy2Q1ysIqx97YKE8hqWkwPVIg6FplQmCa4evCvy4sxn4ksKOQV3C9 mXdiVKxWw8VwZWl1vXYwSe/hM2JEPo5Ib3pxU3F9M43ggHTZhTotNpJlR2iMmlBK9CnC E/Ue804dVpvUQAisivLxBA8ysPXOGRrmLDk0carD7dtCIY3oS8QXDQhtcDgoj86zMqMj ck6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=swLHGVEBlIGOMERxYpSSTJzeZSyVbzPg9dI3qdLm/EM=; b=G14zkHfukeXqbaRXICxVD38/DJJz8hmWcjijnkHTwfw7NTnx8L3XvPcDNdqia7R3f4 SV9YpZr5J1Y8V/UA//lWfNYCUN2ahflc1gvb5InQ/mATZtpHjvueYki8TWeZ6VBhNNwm AwQVDSr5WpjtGP+w51OHpWMtACONNc/KkA/7bnJVuIgTaYvhlymkzn0R06QGtZdVH+kj gsoOjHM14AcxqgmYnqT4p4p9GIOzGus+m8kI8CJDrWc4EKgjhZZJb9YNnQCes6Kr4Z85 +5vSyfeiUPOzfgr4saKZteCZ5E4/mYr5GwzXVgy0IpKZEyHoylvrFGaCehKbHaQXgyLr OLOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous824QtEZrp0jhisqMpEbbyaRjuqUZZZlQY7sQV2hwMDVWbDpsxByJ8x0/ccFhuHA== X-Received: by 10.107.135.142 with SMTP id r14mr22736044ioi.133.1471043622104; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:13:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zony (206-188-64-44.cpe.distributel.net. [206.188.64.44]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x13sm1978051ite.1.2016.08.12.16.13.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:13:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874mc2g9cr.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:28:20 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122143 Archived-At: found 19737 24.5 tags 19737 fixed close 19737 25.1 quit Marcin Borkowski writes: > On 2015-02-11, at 15:24, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >>> Content of .emacs file: >>> (setq frame-title-format "%b") >>> (add-hook 'ibuffer-mode-hook (lambda () (ibuffer-auto-mode 1))) >> >>> 1. start Emacs >>> 2. M-x ibuffer >>> 3. press enter (i.e. select *GNU Emacs*) >>> 4. do shift selection by holding shift and pressing the right arrow key >>> several times >> >> Hmm... indeed. This is very peculiar. The same happens in other >> buffers. An important detail seems to be that the "shift+movement" has >> to be the first thing you do after switching to another buffer. > > Hi Ullrich, hi Stefan, > > I tried now (GNU Emacs 25.1.50.7, fa2524b) and could not reproduce it. > Can you confirm that it's ok now or do I miss something? I confirmed the bug is present in 24.4 and 24.5, but not in 25.1; closing.