From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nikolaus Rath Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we go GTK-only? Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:25:03 -0700 Message-ID: <87wpglr8fk.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> References: <24db2975-17ca-ad01-20c8-df12071fa89a@dancol.org> <4615E73A-19E2-4B79-9889-D3FA686DDDE6@raeburn.org> <83bmy0pl8p.fsf@gnu.org> <831sywp7ew.fsf@gnu.org> <83y413nsjm.fsf@gnu.org> <83funbnngl.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1ifnmto.fsf@gnu.org> <20161101152027.5e94b6cc@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83ziljm0ei.fsf@gnu.org> <83ins5nai2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478114772 29690 195.159.176.226 (2 Nov 2016 19:26:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 19:26:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 02 20:26:08 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c21AU-00053k-N9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:25:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57330 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c21AX-0006NT-FA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c219s-0006NN-78 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c219o-0001Zu-AJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:43478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c219o-0001Wc-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:25:08 -0400 Original-Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7388F20A20 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:25:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:25:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= smtpout; bh=0Y7UckPKRPQOGcHcSCrVbX3Ixr0=; b=ZZ36PeV0rn2+GNlvBrqj YJovobdORfPrtHc4FYVFGZdHPTiEltuNNGJpgKx4onY39uF1Al6CLn4HmgLxrdVM sZ2Sipc6lg0AT6SYEK5Lx0gPLaCTqjMebIyJ55VbihiNgVkC2G1DjbA3KXQZlKxt +rgVIryvWXFhyUpLs3MvnAI= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: nh1CcalUqE1NfqQmPfUGWcPKEUSOE6gxx3b1meAuqMv5 1478114704 Original-Received: from ebox.rath.org (ebox.rath.org [45.79.69.51]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C065ACC024 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:25:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from thinkpad.rath.org (thinkpad [192.168.12.2]) by ebox.rath.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5D4D681 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 19:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by thinkpad.rath.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 93B0EBFEF8; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Copies-To: never Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:04:48 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.26 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209122 Archived-At: On Nov 02 2016, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> "Should", not "will". And on some systems, only with very recent >> library versions. > > Again: which system are you think of that's had a buggy > malloc-with-threads in the last, say, ten years? GNU libc on Linux in 2008, it seems: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D6952 Best, Nikolaus --=20 GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F =C2=BBTime flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.=C2= =AB