From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:46:42 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87wp1ik3ul.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87zikiwpl6.fsf@igalia.com> <87sho1gemz.fsf@gnu.org> <87vasigi2c.fsf@igalia.com> <871sv2krfc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8360d1yzvj.fsf@gnu.org> <877exbhbc5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k21bj7sb.fsf@detlef> <87y3phgf3a.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k210mr8l.fsf@gnu.org> <83374t117z.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7yra2bz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83o9n7t669.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1xu90eg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83indeu0xn.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi6p71dd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83y3m9s27e.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1xo39pu.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d13el010.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83h8sqqaz9.fsf@gnu.org> <83fu89qt7u.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513705585 30018 195.159.176.226 (19 Dec 2017 17:46:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:46:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: 25061@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 19 18:46:21 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLy3-0006tC-Aa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:46:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56984 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRM00-0003M3-7r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:48:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLzq-0003KE-0C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLzm-0002qq-8E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33933) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLzm-0002qX-3l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLzl-0002Vs-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:48:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87zikiwpl6.fsf@igalia.com> Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25061 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.15137056409599 (code B ref -1); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2017 17:47:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42611 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLz6-0002Ul-Ec for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:47:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53369) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLz5-0002UZ-Kc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:47:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLyz-00028n-MP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:47:14 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:50635) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLyz-00028X-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLyv-00031a-Pc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLym-0001wP-H5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:47:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=35747 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLym-0001tV-7M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:47:00 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRLwh-00017z-Bl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:44:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:sb1rsrKZjh9lpOzkc9hT9nQ2Pcs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:141260 Archived-At: On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 17:17:41 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: EZ> Btw, you may wish to consider implementing the removal of %DUMBFW EZ> inside gnutls.c, when the version of GnuTLS doesn't support that, this EZ> could be cleaner on the Lisp level. Emacs now collects all the GnuTLS extensions into the list returned by `gnutls-available-p' and that's used by gnutls.el. I hope that's enough to resolve this problem. I don't think the C code should be modifying the priority string before it's passed on. That can cause pretty bad problems. Ted