From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: An article about Emacs for TUGboat Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:03:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87wozh7zru.fsf@mbork.pl> References: <87tvuo4oez.fsf@mbork.pl> <3779DEDB-48B0-4AFD-8620-E249105E6CF3@gmail.com> <87r2ps3tex.fsf@mbork.pl> <2A376770-58D9-4864-94AC-9328C3D0F8D0@gmail.com> <86h8qmgosd.fsf@zoho.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1518530575 15429 195.159.176.226 (13 Feb 2018 14:02:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:02:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 27.0.50 Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 13 15:02:51 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1elbA7-0001nK-UD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:02:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36502 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elbC4-0005we-MO for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:04:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53293) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elbBH-0005vD-MA for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:03:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elbBD-0007lQ-Pk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:03:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:43650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elbBD-0007kw-EJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:03:31 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CC9E68C5; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:03:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PVaXsvZ49Cah; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:03:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (apn-31-1-171-82.dynamic.gprs.plus.pl [31.1.171.82]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FAC1E6870; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:03:21 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <86h8qmgosd.fsf@zoho.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:115970 Archived-At: On 2018-02-12, at 17:23, Emanuel Berg wrote: > Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > >> I agree; while not trying to tell OP what to >> write, in the specific case of Emacs, it >> would be nice if the focus is on how Emacs >> speeds up LateX writing in general/vis-a-vis >> other editors instead > > Are you sure that will happen? > > Perhaps writing LaTeX in Emacs is more > enjoyable and skillful, rather... :) Have you used AUCTeX? And btw, it's not only a question of speed. AUCTeX's C-c C-r is a lifesaver, for instance. Best, -- Marcin Borkowski