From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Juliusz Chroboczek Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Checking for loss of information on integer conversion Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 23:31:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87woza7wwi.fsf@trurl.irif.fr> References: <7432641a-cedc-942c-d75c-0320fce5ba39@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1518993088 12128 195.159.176.226 (18 Feb 2018 22:31:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 22:31:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 18 23:31:24 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enXTz-00015c-Td for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 23:30:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46781 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enXW1-0001WU-UU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enXV8-0001Po-OS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enXV5-0000mJ-Gm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:32:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=39362 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enXV5-0000l6-9G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:32:03 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enXSV-0003wJ-Dm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 23:29:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:USaMD1eYMNyXLG0CMIxecaciUyQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222886 Archived-At: > Second, although Emacs still reads large integers like > 18446744073709551616 as if they were floating-point, it now signals an > error if information is lost in the process. That's better, but still horrible. > Another possibility would be for Emacs to signal an error when reading any > integer that does not fit in fixnum bounds. Please do that.