From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31920: 26.1; frame appears in wrong part of desktop after restoring frameset from fullscreen Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:07:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87woukpph3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <5B2B50C8.2090600@gmx.at> <87zhzo3083.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2CB996.4060606@gmx.at> <877emr2hmf.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2CE8F0.8070702@gmx.at> <87zhzn0w1y.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2E0779.4080201@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530090378 29341 195.159.176.226 (27 Jun 2018 09:06:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 09:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31920@debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 27 11:06:13 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fY6Ou-0007Rp-SQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:06:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57516 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fY6R2-0002YR-8Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:08:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44273) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fY6Qs-0002XI-0O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:08:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fY6Qk-0004yg-BD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:08:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57187) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fY6Qk-0004yc-6H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fY6Qj-00056Z-QI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 09:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31920 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31920-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31920.153009045019571 (code B ref 31920); Wed, 27 Jun 2018 09:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2018 09:07:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36847 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fY6QE-00055b-0O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:07:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-f175.google.com ([209.85.128.175]:42141) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fY6QC-00055O-5Z for 31920@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:07:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p1-v6so1211367wrs.9 for <31920@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 02:07:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B1i0AGxpS0xk2Wkpy9xsw2RRwpQI4Ahy7RmqB5FzLcQ=; b=irIL5jMBmVI9sTb7b5C0H/WZoaR6VAey8XIu4X6zmX2LWe5CUIJ7LYGo2hJhZu+f8C wOv78BG4zsrRszCMpad4693izZbp5OhiJ+pixt9i8in+qYeEdtSsf6An6ZI3dpSmODEw AjJKJB5F/4lAOdgIzdmw4sZb9z3tQCmHurF3YzZVX/mDbs9INBgP6Tn/ySWVAbZ5NeGb nBPEZ63V/QBARyBXtygBd5OksrpKJx4b4Unmd+iPTSVT1vvsK7CzZ2FW9vhNbfGx4vHN bZOAzGfuqaXAy56+7QJvu0cuSeaknwdrUIV/4tijqUhWKHRY764NMzJdoxcHYQ/gvJmv 14fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B1i0AGxpS0xk2Wkpy9xsw2RRwpQI4Ahy7RmqB5FzLcQ=; b=smQdAQBsE6Ox9eFU3X9zIlfNXpLeZOR4SQY891wU+d7mGX1ePKsee2+vJucLNzCZsC 5mBSL9HXv6djkS1bHvCT41nm+imta7IbvSr+/qqiD6A22HD9SkFLRZbwnb49YZRU5Zj1 V9S8wGqh7I3NwyPZ0Nb2r5Eke391oez5YcB4sf22MGRIWf0YijAsva4qZWWhTtHX9WSn QmD4jy3aq+8jiC67vrDTItRH3BMEG9+djq4wvX32MAkV+wmLWqGLe6QPLzaEe+ILAFXl 2CghxTvH6iNjgwYvnDqePnBwtWUQnGauTthDSMffi8UlCbvuEHDgpvI9EZFu8cRMZlg1 Ng8w== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0x6IAT7gqzbgJ33HD09pqYzkRBIamVB+3VYEzU9EBtU8cFsdn1 Bm0mXvfp7kmU43bW8P4elIs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpc80lPZRm/65e0Qz0PdoSR0UIxyHVeM1PZ5/pe1XDuYpaVUf9OEKmUGFLJBRL00gl23dZlXzw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ca13:: with SMTP id o19-v6mr4348787wrh.148.1530090442476; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 02:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu (36.28.158.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.158.28.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k7-v6sm2720576wrq.82.2018.06.27.02.07.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jun 2018 02:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <5B2E0779.4080201@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 23 Jun 2018 10:40:25 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147856 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > I found a simpler scenario: With emacs -Q do C-x r f a, drag the frame > somewhere else on your screen and do C-x r j a. Here the registered > position is restored. Now do C-x r f a, drag the frame somewhere > else, do F11 and C-x r j a. Here the frame is restored to the > position it had before F11 and not to the one registered by C-x r f a. > I confirm this exact behaviour under GTK. > So this time it seems that I have the right explanation: We first > position the frame according to the position from the register and > then demaximize it. But we should first demaximize and then > reposition it. Can you confirm? That looks like it. The patch I sent earlier fixes it for me, but I=CA=BCm not sure it=CA=BCs the right solution, it feels very heavyweight. Robert