From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28257: 26.0.50; [PATCH] expose eldoc functions in a hook Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:51:33 -0400 Message-ID: <87wohasikq.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ziakwifi.fsf@holos> <87val88l0d.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <20170828031104.GA15524@holos.localdomain> <87shgb89q1.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <20170830015017.GA28668@holos.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="108759"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Mark Oteiza , 28257@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 25 00:52:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfXop-000S7z-8P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:52:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55248 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfXon-0005Vo-NM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfXoh-0005VP-6U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfXog-0002i4-8y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfXog-0002hj-4Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfXog-00013H-1n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28257 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 28257-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28257.15614167024006 (code B ref 28257); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28257) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 22:51:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfXoL-00012X-RB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:51:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:42571) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfXoK-00012G-El for 28257@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id u19so369507ior.9 for <28257@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:51:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=DTROWRcK5etCrfxs2lPBBfabOk41yReYJk2QAKZKal4=; b=lgtX+qnKqcuqVjqNyrzkcEZyCZgjvYM2Tt226a17nvFsFPNGT00FhhfyptSGWm0qsW 4WJR2b+iO41a/t1UYTt3KFiDkzpreIPI+R4Jh8DEZNGSF+lk8D+5Jr6vSiMqsTW6Ieqs AZlbimLaitkqWPASWbJKaKDgY/v6sPm0igLSpgGijEWASAHHAnn5GSDyB6/F3b1Yo/m5 JhriECFAU8TIXN5kkB4IhzbKl+yr//1P2Fstm7Jdh7RvraRUR+qfgkn2jBHf63DwRS9h uMCrdf17k/rowRyw6NrlOzTkUD/oWk3Y6cvzEjKOh7RA1pW+WFmu12dHdZxKNEfkNFCa 8cHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=DTROWRcK5etCrfxs2lPBBfabOk41yReYJk2QAKZKal4=; b=Sff4NYxJKrG1S3/PIFfdLOZenA9hV+CEhdtl2FdVk/6gb7C7ujXJAx3tqo3AjbxBEX 4F/ki3i4Godp1aVF+w815LIWxB9C2AAg26zhon7hz+ptldONFlowb9iKw25GlI8Xkcd1 KABhVClrqoGFQ3dVKYT7aZV5TfpRAM54xG3NxjyxIb9HAm1C7YxF+j1O0+kKX2lKJRBW YCdmqW7LCTVAz8jlcPbIyw4fDMyOtcqQFztIpsazmjrQtwQZ4ZfnOo2pC1qPRJ1/oo9b f1aGEm7eJfiPO4fBHDVgo8bfuP5mu3GXYYKBMUgmzVPS7/IXZR69U4tiysNHo5NDmt/X 7VlA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUSEG2V1JvkQZr9T85VqAbu2okcqBYzr24gOWb6jyJ8izUyPMyY LsZzXm6gqNz56MIKa2yCQWo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx9pucAuFu1aXSXjvlW2ehWbf/CZOCsrKTXhv8Cwp9DliVFJwISP/qHcINRZWiv5zl43cImhQ== X-Received: by 2002:a02:3904:: with SMTP id l4mr44099548jaa.81.1561416694932; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n26sm9818440ioc.74.2019.06.24.15.51.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:51:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:16:23 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161294 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Mark Oteiza writes: > >>> Could be a worthwhile tradeoff (especially >>>since there currently aren't any individual mode eldoc functions using >>>anything apart from :before-until, afaik); I'm on the fence about this. >> >> Not in emacs, at least. In elpa, ggtags uses :after-until. The only >> 3rd party packages--that I can think of right now--that implement eldoc >> functions just use setq-local (elpy and geiser). > > Noam, still on the fence? I haven't really thought about this much, maybe bring it up on emacs-devel?