From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tab bar tabs landed on master Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 19:31:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87wodg31k4.fsf@gnus.org> References: <8736gci5jn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zhikp0ba.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87lfu4jbbu.fsf@Ergus.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87tv8myi8m.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83imp13ihn.fsf@gnu.org> <87wodhn21l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ftk51ydt.fsf@gnu.org> <87imp1k79d.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838spx1x74.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7adiraz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83k19gzd6k.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="21186"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Juri Linkov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 07 19:31:29 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHWr2-0005MZ-6u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 19:31:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48172 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHWr0-0000J9-UC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 13:31:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHWqq-0000GY-JO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 13:31:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHWqp-000705-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 13:31:16 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:36932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHWqp-0006zK-6E; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 13:31:15 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHWqh-0006OY-FM; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 19:31:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83k19gzd6k.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2019 20:18:59 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240714 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> "C-x 7" is an illogical key, it breaks the sequence of C-x 4, C-x 5. > > Then how about the suggestion to use "C-x t" instead? > >> We need to ask the users of 2C how often they use C-x 6. >> I believe they are using a more mnemonic key f2. > > Asking them and receiving the answers could take ages. I don't think > we have that time. We need to decide soon, because once the emacs-27 > branch is cut, it will be harder to make such changes. > > Would more people please speak up on this issue, and suggest > alternative prefixes if they have ideas about that? I'm pretty uninformed about the tab bar stuff, but I would prefer `C-x t' over `C-x 6'. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no