From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3226: here-document syntax inference and completion is broken Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 03:40:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87wod5o4bm.fsf@gnus.org> References: <4A00BA64.7080700@phox.ca> <87eezjm5ss.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="125580"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 3226@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Paul Nienaber Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 16 03:41:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iKYJN-000WXq-1k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 03:41:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34950 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKYJL-0006nl-QW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:41:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKYJE-0006jl-Qh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:41:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKYJC-0006Zc-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKYJC-0006ZV-Ao for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKYJC-0001xg-5p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 01:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 3226 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 3226-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B3226.15711900547520 (code B ref 3226); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 01:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3226) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2019 01:40:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45061 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKYJ3-0001xD-MB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:40:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.231.51] (port=43206 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKYJ0-0001x1-QQ for 3226@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:40:51 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iKYIv-0007G7-Im; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 03:40:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paul Nienaber's message of "Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:09:18 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169412 Archived-At: Paul Nienaber writes: > While I use here-strings more than here-docs by a huge margin I would > also like to not negatively impact people using the former a lot, so > in light of that I'd like to suggest going with Stefan's suggestion, > importantly because it's also totally valid to trip on '<<-' and > '<<[A-Za-z]', whereas here-strings are always only '<<<'. Also > '<