From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28747: 26.0.60; Usage of "&rest body" in Edebug specs Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 16:02:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87wod0sujk.fsf@web.de> References: <87o9phznq7.fsf@runbox.com> <87sgnto1bf.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="220779"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Gemini Lasswell , 28747@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 19 16:04:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iLpL4-000vE0-4a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 16:04:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55378 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLpKw-00084z-6H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 10:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLpJv-0007nd-L4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 10:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLpJu-0007py-OX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 10:03:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44623) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLpJu-0007pq-5h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 10:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLpJt-0006ti-Ue for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 10:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28747 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 28747-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28747.157149373426455 (code B ref 28747); Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2019 14:02:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLpJ6-0006sa-86 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 10:02:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:40227) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLpJ3-0006sL-1K for 28747@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 10:02:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1571493721; bh=gRIsjND1BO9NuR2RtBYqW+1vlBtWVzZQAKqdxU/xx44=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=eT13HBj3MnSF3VhK3xf0QLx4L/OK6HirL7LWYMyvIgTaxdOymGBs9KOZr4EqahIOe /iDZoGx3QQjfZWnUqF9yFRDS5J9jdQNkYu7GZbBvpEHGhwAJ3gS8+fkioUuFXaj3S+ 6M0fk7Wa7XBvGynOSrND4DLyu5fB2wfNZptCF8zY= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.222.9]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MeBPe-1igEER0hZu-00Py77; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 16:02:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sgnto1bf.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 16 Oct 2019 04:45:40 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:OYPJRGTPxUwkG0h4RRNYS79JfFtNyxM+SSaJf+75Rfw57KQCEI+ LCN+twReTLK3D+4JWX3+H268rnSmJSSy7NR7m3B6OjMRagplBROJW0PX8jxIzAKCQb2VR9W fTticKYjd3uEkgjPF5RP9ulThjL2p9083kg8XpvTRefdYdROPjGctnF2RS4lpXKirepDcnZ 73K8s2Kjx+ytSllU96BSA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Sdpq/Z6qtzc=:vqn/xqHJ5tBSkEejF+v9nl FuMB8oB4mAwZhUw1vML9ylBGR+suaAvnLm7Qzl0hhsuaFvXy+N9pOL6JKiy8NCR/MTX2cl7du 9LlWIYR26IgIq7YI+cCqRt+x1WMx9mOr86njEeff5uPUMjV/kPkec/jzwKLhkXh1Gfo4U0zlk S6ukfLFeZZd9it5NL9er5oUHrCMfvPUNlBQoFNPEuaahdLAIqEbUMQhi5/ohOxb6jUb8JWPpt GBt7GvUsNNVlyNCOyNQ4YXUZRXLWl7nMvBHZVM8NEL3gsKvliKvgi2MCtu+bBYSTywPnhEcXR Kgq7wYdj/wcse0yZkZvPYPpv++m5kSi/SRm8u1C5VzKxezVN2+hidCBorUgIVX1Rx+ti/saxT 8VD97MEpUTzroj2WhQ5yZNhrFq6m8Ap0K9MmOBFsxr+zsiEIxkCOnCKQ1yJp8+3nFzcXjGA/a kQv8qpHZ1yZ1aeAopcLzB541/z5nOXjtlFdO1TNUmeNJUsNJolkN+AmVyFU7G3Q03T78WYT3X DMLkthUjxvZ2wDGj3PVfuhrnZQ9MLpd6Bk6gRlx7XGvJk1NHxc/pvZV4SVcyXQtza0FJsjWIy cTxh2Y6GeCAmXYHG68f0boGNjvEIHWkrDO+FyArthNemaenksN3jBCCo7yZINWhFWuzNLHg31 iKlvrHzjn2Iets3XhfwEJMuw56YhEWeTy//JihSOyPgiFpDDgXIZfkFGL9lQbc167c26rv7BK Ax4gWUXH2WSvF1ViImi9LVg+ZpnmPZvRI81eRAGDi5EL6Z0tv2e/bSgXNr5cOloBAWVkhflx X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169741 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I agree that this would be a lot clearer and probably less error-prone > than &rest. > > Does anybody have an opinion here? It could be worth changing it. There are a lot of things where understanding Edebug specs gets complicated. Anything to make things clearer is good. Michael.