From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39504: 27.0.60; [PATCH] eww/shr: Ensure faces of enclosing elements apply to elements Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:46:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87wo8g1523.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87zhdundsc.fsf@gmail.com> <87eeup5qru.fsf@gnus.org> <87wo8gsxzf.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="97587"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 39504@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 21 13:47:20 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j57iB-000PGX-P3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:47:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56380 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j57i9-0007Oo-8B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:47:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j57hv-0007O2-44 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:47:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j57hu-0001Ux-3d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j57ht-0001Uq-V2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j57ht-0005c3-Tk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39504 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed patch Original-Received: via spool by 39504-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39504.158228920021542 (code B ref 39504); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2020 12:46:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46515 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j57hY-0005bO-8a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:46:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34728) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j57hX-0005b7-6s for 39504@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:46:39 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j57hM-0007CN-TF; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:46:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wo8gsxzf.fsf@gmail.com> ("=?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec"'s message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2020 23:19:32 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176358 Archived-At: K=C3=A9vin Le Gouguec writes: > Just to be sure, are we fine with how things look on emacs-27? I'm not > saying the situation there is unacceptable or anything; I'm just > wondering if we're comfortable with the behaviour change between 26 and > 27 (cf. screenshots in the opening message). It's a mostly cosmetic > issue anyway. I don't think it's worth backporting the fix to the release branch. > Speaking of cosmetic issues, how did you apply my patch? I did it by hand since there were two patches in the email and the `M-m' command in debbugs-gnu (which does all this applying and marking with bug numbers automatically) doesn't like that. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no