From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix placement of toggle and radio button in Lucid menu. Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:46:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87wnhjdmxe.fsf@elite.giraud> References: <87sfs87i5o.fsf@elite.giraud> <87pmnc7f5c.fsf@yahoo.com> <87k0dk7ejd.fsf@yahoo.com> <878rtzb3hr.fsf@elite.giraud> <83h78nqguu.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnhj152u.fsf@elite.giraud> <83a6efqepd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38487"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (berkeley-unix) Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 25 15:52:37 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nNbxV-0009lW-6J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:52:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41718 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nNbxT-0002am-VX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:52:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nNbrM-0006Gb-EY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:46:16 -0500 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]:35899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nNbrJ-0000t8-MW; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:46:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=rsa; bh=sz3vQwRf8qgXP9Xn BWUirp8ReRlrQr25iYoW4YgN+Xs=; h=in-reply-to:date:references:subject: cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=jVg0qfXgfXzeGx1MOV5hMWsRmXjqiJ59b8+KvK 571UOA280g55tC8d5i3Q2Umv4EsV2v6B3lWGZALSsOmy/4Wd6gT718OTc4YDjoMeY2cqFk tF796L1nTTkw8OlNbYrX387OYCtzWdCitGDaXMr3eDlPZRQSkjg0ZrcB9N1d2zHV2NpxkB ero7GI7iqRXa3P6gGq8efH7z62TSGUswjM9VcFBa6Ghp/6i4i+bCWwZp0jmsGWGWzIkfmO BlS/0WA0zFhf+GAY9yBgKb6TDSSwuf1thU4IaZ04pgIxp6u2PkyxMzEPvfTKQEl0CFAjaB GRXRmBFsaBDGxda1LSaUeBxg== Original-Received: from elite.giraud ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e360a038 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:46:08 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83a6efqepd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:05:18 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=51.159.28.247; envelope-from=manuel@ledu-giraud.fr; helo=ledu-giraud.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286684 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > So is this just an aesthetic issue? If so, perhaps adding a variable > exposed to Lisp could be enough: then users who, like you, dislike the > default display, can control the offset. Yes, as usually with widget, it is indeed an aesthetic issue. I think that you also thought about aesthetic when you said "Basically, I don't understand why the original code doesn't appear to do its job as intended." As for having a variable exposed to Lisp, I'm with Po Lu on this one: if those widgets cannot move for some reasons I think having it exposed to Lisp is a bit too much. -- Manuel Giraud