From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fwd: A TAB operation reform question. Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 08:15:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87wn96x4v4.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87tu4blmf0.fsf@laptop.lockywolf.net> <87mta3krsg.fsf@laptop.lockywolf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23078"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:u8exTHso4Yyf2+R4PH9HfBtHzrU= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 11 09:04:00 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oi9J2-0005iD-3X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:04:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58540 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oi9J0-0008BP-FM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 03:03:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oi8cg-0006xu-I3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:20:17 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:33844) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oi8cY-0007RA-31 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:20:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oi8cU-00021x-GY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 08:20:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:47:52 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297428 Archived-At: Vladimir Nikishkin wrote: > But still, I would like to ask what Emacs developers think > about this issue. Would it be possible to repurpose TAB from > "sometimes TAB, sometimes indent, sometimes complete", to > a more general-purpose dwim framework? What is it you want it to do, and when? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal