From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 10:32:07 +0000 Message-ID: <87wmxbtsd4.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmxj27fn.fsf@dfreeman.email> <831qfrptiq.fsf@gnu.org> <57429221-d9be-5791-e975-b3539905e2f6@gutov.dev> <83a5udlj47.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5udk1co.fsf@posteo.net> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <87il90znco.fsf@yahoo.com> <1977fbef-307b-bcf4-9448-64f26916dd65@gutov.dev> <87edjozlqq.fsf@yahoo.com> <43ddad10-49dd-1c49-ebfe-51689780b315@gutov.dev> <83jztgk410.fsf@gnu.org> <83edjojx8c.fsf@gnu.org> <8734zzv7vk.fsf@localhost> <83edjjecmx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39092"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, dmitry@gutov.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 12:32:40 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qbeyc-0009vN-N2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:32:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbexi-0005P6-KZ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:31:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbexg-0005Od-7f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:31:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbexd-0001RG-Hn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:31:39 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D72240029 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:31:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693477895; bh=07yOfr/CRaf0uDd8bKPa2jmQFxLYptgGspy6DFobqlE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=oycIPbQ8l7LmYdYW8lAbwTEHktTQ7St2fZ6p02vTDXeiihYEsEqtdome20J5cLOWx WDTF6eo5zZSg7YbTkhMVowKWEdOOZgC6UsWHExkC56KYHFNtJc+gQzOOzYN76xpVPB vFpjv1/Rbs1iGQdBkeB2y0VsZrs4SXVqTlBuwUbR2JoJZuEkcXpdgG1LcuMg4PyJVG 0VB0vUyg1U8IJUWpucOaSvTRFHzAIGkgrX3W1ltGR93bn3HAhHrhemvazuUUwdHnJp bdUm4IQsdMvXy0RTutiXyLVmB14mRzttEVdPHYcP0vDxBeChW1cAHCwp5CkrEPe6lW bSm5Ma1v1SYyA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RbyBY20FZz9rxY; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:31:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83edjjecmx.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309615 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Is there any downside holding on a minor release if _some_ bugs are >> already fixed, even if others are not yet? > > What would be the point? People who want something like that can > simply build the Git release branch, where we fix bugs every few days. For Org, a number of people just update from ELPA. Releasing benefits these users. > A minor release is more than just code with some bugs fixed: it (a) > has no known bugs except those whose fix is too risky, and (b) was > tested in the wild during a pretest. You are right. To clarify: I am talking about _bugfix_ releases. Like Org 9.6.7 -> 9.6.8. Emacs does not have those, currently. >> What I recently did for Org's bugfix releases was: >> 1. Every two weeks I see if some bug fixes landed on bugfix branch >> 2. If there are, I just tag a bugfix release > > If all you do is tag a commit, then that's not what constitutes a > minor release in Emacs. We do much more than just tagging. So, what about "bugfix" releases? AFAIU, it is mostly producing a release tarball + waiting for Emacs to be packaged on major GNU/Linux distributions. The timing would be anything acceptable for the latter task, which appears to be a bottleneck in such scenario. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at